Page 1 of 1
Cannot open VM on MacOS High Sierra 10.14
Posted: 3. Oct 2018, 05:18
by peter-wangxu
ModEdit; split from: Cannot open VM on MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6
I met the same issue as the poster
My VB version is:Version 5.2.18 r124319 (Qt5.6.3)
My MacOS: 10.14(Mojave)
I tried all of above solutions but no luck till now
Any more steps for triage VB itself so that I can post it here?
Thanks
Peter
Re: Cannot open VM on MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6
Posted: 3. Oct 2018, 11:12
by socratis
peter-wangxu wrote:I tried all of above solutions but no luck till now
So, where is your ZIPPED installer.log file then?
Re: Cannot open VM on MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6
Posted: 3. Oct 2018, 14:55
by peter-wangxu
socratis wrote:So, where is your ZIPPED installer.log file then?
please check attachment
Re: Cannot open VM on MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6
Posted: 4. Oct 2018, 09:15
by socratis
@peter-wangxu
2018-10-03 20:40:27+08 yuzhiwxdeMacBook-Pro Installer[813]: Displaying 'Install Succeeded' UI.
Your installation seems fine. Would you mind posting the actual error message(s) instead of a "me too"? Because this is not a "me too" case, I might have to split your posts from the original thread. It definitely doesn't look like an installation problem, like the OP had.
Plus, you're on 10.14. Splitting after all, that's the proper thing to do...
Re: Cannot open VM on MacOS High Sierra 10.14
Posted: 4. Oct 2018, 22:29
by The Traveler
I have just updated to 10.14 and my VirtualBox has the zero with the line thru it. I am tying to install Nox Player so I can play my android games but because VirtualBox isn't compatible now, will it ever be? Or is there a non technical answer as I am not that well versed in computer language. Thanks for any help.
Re: Cannot open VM on MacOS High Sierra 10.14
Posted: 5. Oct 2018, 03:55
by socratis
The Traveler wrote:and my VirtualBox has the zero with the line thru it.
Excuse me? What does that mean?
The Traveler wrote:I am tying to install Nox Player
Then you should ask at the Nox support. VirtualBox is not Nox.
The Traveler wrote:but because VirtualBox isn't compatible now, will it ever be?
I'm not even sure what that means. Can you explain it a little better, or with other words?