socratis wrote:That's not your end goal, that's a means to the goal. Having fixed size folders on its own doesn't make too much sense.
What I'm trying to do is limit the desktop "folders" to DVD size, so that I can manually fill them, over time, with a large variety of files which I need to go through manually, where I want the size-limited folder to never exceed DVD size (nominally let's just use
4.5GB as a pragmatic value but where the actual size isn't the issue here).
Suffice to say there will be multiple folders, some for photos of x, others for photos of y, others for videos of x, and others for videos of y, others for files related to x, and another for files related to y, etc., where I will be moving myriad files into these folders over a period of days or weeks as an organizational task, and then I will be burning those data files, each to separate DVDs for storage and specific distribution purposes.
However, the moment I mention the dirty word "DVD", some people go bonkers because some people are dead set against the entire concept of DVD media (despite the fact that almost every desktop on the planet has the hardware, and so do most laptops except the newest thinnest ones, and despite the fact that they store nicely in stacks with well-written large labels, which USB sticks can't compete with in organization and where USB sticks can't compare in terms of 5GB quantum cost when distributed to others in the snail mail system).
If I only needed a single DVD-size-limited folder, then I could just format an open DVD and slide the files on ad-hoc, or I could even use the Windows "recycle bin" which happens to be able to be size limited. And, if I wanted to, I could buy a dozen DVD burners, and hook them up on a USB hub to accomplish the simultaneous task of filling each "folder" with data over the coming weeks. But that's slow, and crazy (and can't be undone when inevitable mistakes are made).
Could I just use a non-size-limited folder? Yes. But that's so much of a pain that anyone who suggests that hasn't actually ever done it, at least not with large files and many folders. Right clicking and checking the size is a PITA in many ways. Better to have the folder itself limited in size.
Could I just use a series of DVD-size-limited flash drives? Yes. But adding superfluous hardware is not the goal here since the goal is to use the existing terabyte of disk space and not purchasing a handful of slow flash cards that have their own cost and labeling and file-corruption problems.
Could I just use third-party archival software and/or third-party DVD burner software that makes a series of discs, e.g., disc 1 of 20, disc 2 of 20, disc 3 of 20, etc.? Sure, but each disc has to stand on its own while the third party tools adds its own level of complexity to what should be a simple task - which is to limit the size of folders to less than DVD size and let the Guest OS tell me when I'm getting full.
socratis wrote:If you want something size limited, you could very well create additional virtual hard drives from VirtualBox, with the required size, and attach them to your VM. They will appear as additional hard drives in your guest. E:\, F:\, etc.
Ah. This might be the best idea yet. I will look up how to create "virtual hard drives from VirtualBox".
Hopefully, they will not have the corruption problem that Microsoft states is the problem with the Microsoft Virtual Hard Drive mechanism.