Can't start VM contained in external EXFAT drive (beginner)
Posted: 7. Jan 2014, 17:57
I'm trying to create a virtualbox guest on an external EXFAT drive that can be moved between its original Ubuntu linux host and an OSX Mavericks host. I am experienced Ubuntu user but beginner with OSX Mavericks.
Host #1 - Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit) running Virtualbox 4.3.6
Host #2 - OSX Mavericks running Virtualbox 4.3.6
Guest - Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit)
.vbox/.vdi file storage - removable SSD formatted EXFAT on OSX, then mounted as EXFAT on Ubuntu using FUSE filesystem.
Both Host OS were fully updated before commencing.
Guest was created on Host #1 and runs perfectly.
On Host #1, Guest was cleanly closed, Virtualbox cleanly exited, and SSD cleanly unmounted from Host #1.
Next, SSD was transported to Host #2 (OSX Mavericks) and attached to that machine.
My goals are (1) run the guest on Host #2, and (2) copy the guest files (.vbox and .vdi)
from the SSD to the OSX machine's internal hard drive.
Problems (both attempted separately, each after a fresh startup of OSX.)
1. When trying to copy the .vdi file (without Virtualbox running) from the SSD to the OSX Mavericks hard drive, OSX copy progress indicator never leaves "zero bytes" copied indication, and after a few minutes fails with the message " ". During this time, the SSD shows continuous activity from OSX.
2. I start Virtualbox on the OSX machine, and attempt to make it accessible with Machine->Add. This step works (that is, the guest appears in the list of guests in the Virtualbox main window), however, when I try to start the guest, I see the initial guest window but it remains black screen; there is no progress after several minutes. During this time, the SSD shows continuous activity from OSX. I am unable to cleanly exit either the starting guest or the Virtualbox main window.
I speculate that something is preventing OSX from directly (or via Virtualbox) reading the .vdi file, however, I do not know how to proceed. I chose EXFAT for the SSD because it is read/write accessible from both OSX (natively) and Ubuntu (via FUSE driver), and seemed like a reasonable choice given that the underlying OS in the guest already would have journal file system, etc.
Thanks for any follow-up questions, assistance or suggestions.
Host #1 - Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit) running Virtualbox 4.3.6
Host #2 - OSX Mavericks running Virtualbox 4.3.6
Guest - Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit)
.vbox/.vdi file storage - removable SSD formatted EXFAT on OSX, then mounted as EXFAT on Ubuntu using FUSE filesystem.
Both Host OS were fully updated before commencing.
Guest was created on Host #1 and runs perfectly.
On Host #1, Guest was cleanly closed, Virtualbox cleanly exited, and SSD cleanly unmounted from Host #1.
Next, SSD was transported to Host #2 (OSX Mavericks) and attached to that machine.
My goals are (1) run the guest on Host #2, and (2) copy the guest files (.vbox and .vdi)
from the SSD to the OSX machine's internal hard drive.
Problems (both attempted separately, each after a fresh startup of OSX.)
1. When trying to copy the .vdi file (without Virtualbox running) from the SSD to the OSX Mavericks hard drive, OSX copy progress indicator never leaves "zero bytes" copied indication, and after a few minutes fails with the message " ". During this time, the SSD shows continuous activity from OSX.
2. I start Virtualbox on the OSX machine, and attempt to make it accessible with Machine->Add. This step works (that is, the guest appears in the list of guests in the Virtualbox main window), however, when I try to start the guest, I see the initial guest window but it remains black screen; there is no progress after several minutes. During this time, the SSD shows continuous activity from OSX. I am unable to cleanly exit either the starting guest or the Virtualbox main window.
I speculate that something is preventing OSX from directly (or via Virtualbox) reading the .vdi file, however, I do not know how to proceed. I chose EXFAT for the SSD because it is read/write accessible from both OSX (natively) and Ubuntu (via FUSE driver), and seemed like a reasonable choice given that the underlying OS in the guest already would have journal file system, etc.
Thanks for any follow-up questions, assistance or suggestions.