AVG reports rootkit
-
ronzul
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 6. Jul 2012, 04:33
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: OSE other
- Guest OSses: Windows XP
- Location: Sydney, Australia
AVG reports rootkit
Good morning/afternoon/evening depending on your time zone.
I've installed a Windows XP guest OS, and some development tools, Microsoft Office etc. I shouldn't have a virus already.
I've now installed AVG, and it reports rootkits in ntoskrnl.exe and hal.sys.
Does VirtualBox do anything to the guest OS images? Would it be touching these files?
Thanks
Ronny
I've installed a Windows XP guest OS, and some development tools, Microsoft Office etc. I shouldn't have a virus already.
I've now installed AVG, and it reports rootkits in ntoskrnl.exe and hal.sys.
Does VirtualBox do anything to the guest OS images? Would it be touching these files?
Thanks
Ronny
-
BillG
- Volunteer
- Posts: 5106
- Joined: 19. Sep 2009, 04:44
- Primary OS: MS Windows 10
- VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
- Guest OSses: Windows 10,7 and earlier
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: AVG reports rootkit
No. If your vm is infected, then it was infected in the usual way. There is nothing special about the OS in a vm. It works just the same way as in a physical machine.
Bill
-
mpack
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 39134
- Joined: 4. Sep 2008, 17:09
- Primary OS: MS Windows 10
- VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
- Guest OSses: Mostly XP
Re: AVG reports rootkit
In essence VirtualBox is a rootkit, though that probably doesn't explain the report.
VirtualBox knows nothing about guest filesystems, so it can't modify guest files very easily (at least not until you install the GAs, which of course could theoretically add that potential). VBox may however, depending on the code, modify the running code in memory. AFAIK that only applies to 16bit code tho.
I guess it's really AVG who you need to be asking for an explanation of their reports.
VirtualBox knows nothing about guest filesystems, so it can't modify guest files very easily (at least not until you install the GAs, which of course could theoretically add that potential). VBox may however, depending on the code, modify the running code in memory. AFAIK that only applies to 16bit code tho.
I guess it's really AVG who you need to be asking for an explanation of their reports.
-
stefan.becker
- Volunteer
- Posts: 7639
- Joined: 7. Jun 2007, 21:53
Re: AVG reports rootkit
Its not the first fail alarm from any antivirus tool.
Have a look at google and you will find that every tool has many fails.
Have a look at google and you will find that every tool has many fails.
German Howto (Linux): http://www.linuxforen.de/forums/showthread.php?t=236444
User Manual / Download Section: http://www.virtualbox.de/wiki/Downloads
FAQ: http://www.virtualbox.de/wiki/User_FAQ http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?t=8669
User Manual / Download Section: http://www.virtualbox.de/wiki/Downloads
FAQ: http://www.virtualbox.de/wiki/User_FAQ http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?t=8669
-
rpmurray
- Volunteer
- Posts: 918
- Joined: 3. Mar 2009, 00:29
- Primary OS: Mac OS X other
- VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
- Guest OSses: Windows 7, Mac OS X (various flavors)
- Location: Between Heaven and Hell
Re: AVG reports rootkit
ronzul, what version of VirtualBox are you running? I'm seeing the same thing.
AVG was reporting no problems up through a couple of days ago and then I updated AVG and let Windows Update update my VM of XP with the latest patches and all of a sudden I'm getting warnings about ntoskrnl.exe and hal.dll and potentially dangerous rootkits.
I have a clean vanilla VM of XP that I was using in testing a while ago so I installed AVG on it and it reported it clean, then I updated it with the latest patches using Windows Update and AVG still reports it as clean (shooting down my theory that it's something caused by a recent update patch).
AVG was reporting no problems up through a couple of days ago and then I updated AVG and let Windows Update update my VM of XP with the latest patches and all of a sudden I'm getting warnings about ntoskrnl.exe and hal.dll and potentially dangerous rootkits.
I have a clean vanilla VM of XP that I was using in testing a while ago so I installed AVG on it and it reported it clean, then I updated it with the latest patches using Windows Update and AVG still reports it as clean (shooting down my theory that it's something caused by a recent update patch).
-
ronzul
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 6. Jul 2012, 04:33
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: OSE other
- Guest OSses: Windows XP
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: AVG reports rootkit
Thanks for the info guys.
And rp, I've just installed the latest version of VirtualBox 4.1.18 r 78361, and the latest version of AVG.
If I get a chance, I might create a new XP install, and immediately install AVG before I do anything else.
Cheers
And rp, I've just installed the latest version of VirtualBox 4.1.18 r 78361, and the latest version of AVG.
If I get a chance, I might create a new XP install, and immediately install AVG before I do anything else.
Cheers
-
ronzul
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 6. Jul 2012, 04:33
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: OSE other
- Guest OSses: Windows XP
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: AVG reports rootkit
Ok, created a new Windows XP VM, and straight away installed AVG.
Same thing, comes up with rootkit reports for ntoskrnl and hal.
Same thing, comes up with rootkit reports for ntoskrnl and hal.
-
Perryg
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 34369
- Joined: 6. Sep 2008, 22:55
- Primary OS: Linux other
- VBox Version: OSE self-compiled
- Guest OSses: *NIX
Re: AVG reports rootkit
Virus checkers false positives are nothing new. You need to report it to the virus software manufacture. There is not a lot that anyone here can do.ronzul wrote:Ok, created a new Windows XP VM, and straight away installed AVG.
Same thing, comes up with rootkit reports for ntoskrnl and hal.
-
ronzul
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 6. Jul 2012, 04:33
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: OSE other
- Guest OSses: Windows XP
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: AVG reports rootkit
Thanks for the tip
Re: AVG reports rootkit
I have excatly the same issue, I have logged it with AVG,
cheers
cheers
Re: AVG reports rootkit
google
Fresh Install Of XP On VirtualBox False Positive Rootkit
to find it on AVGs forums, cannot post a as only just signed up..
Fresh Install Of XP On VirtualBox False Positive Rootkit
to find it on AVGs forums, cannot post a as only just signed up..
-
mpack
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 39134
- Joined: 4. Sep 2008, 17:09
- Primary OS: MS Windows 10
- VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
- Guest OSses: Mostly XP
Re: AVG reports rootkit
You seem to have told them that the GAs were the issue, though I interpreted the last message from Ronzul above to say otherwise (he claimed a new install of nothing but XP and AVG was enough). Perhaps Ronzul could confirm his meaning.
Re: AVG reports rootkit
http://forums.avg.com/ww-en/avg-forums? ... &id=212923
Yes I have since tested and removed the GA and it still has the same issue.
I'll update here if i hear back from them..
cheers
Yes I have since tested and removed the GA and it still has the same issue.
I'll update here if i hear back from them..
cheers
-
mpack
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 39134
- Joined: 4. Sep 2008, 17:09
- Primary OS: MS Windows 10
- VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
- Guest OSses: Mostly XP
Re: AVG reports rootkit
Frankly, knowing how things go around here, I think your last post on their forums is still open to confusion. You have to bear in mind that they may not be familiar with VirtualBox, and may not be aware of the distinction between VirtualBox and "VirtualBox GAs", in which case your last message on their forum may be read as saying that the problem isn't with VirtualBox at all.
If I was you I would edit your last post on that forum to emphasise that to reproduce the problem they need a VirtualBox VM, with XP and AVG installed, and GAs have no influence either way.
If I was you I would edit your last post on that forum to emphasise that to reproduce the problem they need a VirtualBox VM, with XP and AVG installed, and GAs have no influence either way.