4.1.18 and Windows Update

Discussions about using Windows guests in VirtualBox.
Post Reply
Bobio
Posts: 6
Joined: 22. Jun 2012, 01:02
Primary OS: MS Windows 8
VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
Guest OSses: CentOS, Debian, Mint Debian, Oracle Linux, Red Hat EL, Scientific Linux, Ubuntu LTS, WinXP, Win7

4.1.18 and Windows Update

Post by Bobio »

I am running Virtualbox on a Windows Vista Host with several Windows XP guests.

I noticed on one guest that right after updating the Virtualbox Guest Additions Windows Update seems to want to update the Windows Update Active X controls. I tested this on another Guest by running Windows update before updating the Virtualbox Guest Additions and then after. Windows Update only seem to want to update the Windows Update Active X controls AFTER updating Virtualbox Guest Additions to 4.1.18...

Anyone else see this? Seems very odd and makes me a bit suspicious...

Bob
mpack
Site Moderator
Posts: 39134
Joined: 4. Sep 2008, 17:09
Primary OS: MS Windows 10
VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
Guest OSses: Mostly XP

Re: 4.1.18 and Windows Update

Post by mpack »

Suspicious of what? VirtualBox is a hardware simulator. You think the simulation never changes?
Bobio
Posts: 6
Joined: 22. Jun 2012, 01:02
Primary OS: MS Windows 8
VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
Guest OSses: CentOS, Debian, Mint Debian, Oracle Linux, Red Hat EL, Scientific Linux, Ubuntu LTS, WinXP, Win7

Re: 4.1.18 and Windows Update

Post by Bobio »

Probably paranoia but what in the world in a Guest Additions Update could trigger an update to the Windows Update Active X controls.

This is Windows Update itself being updated on the machine, not other software. I can't imagine a change on the Guest machine that would trigger that...
mpack
Site Moderator
Posts: 39134
Joined: 4. Sep 2008, 17:09
Primary OS: MS Windows 10
VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
Guest OSses: Mostly XP

Re: 4.1.18 and Windows Update

Post by mpack »

You would have to ask Microsoft for the lowdown on what their software looks for. It obviously saw what it thought was a significant change.
Post Reply