Hi all,
What is better for running several (3-5) VMs - more cores or more CPU cache? Is it possible to answer in general?
In my case, one VM works as network gateway - it's primary job is to route network packets. There are also linux and windows HTTP servers. Finally, 2-3 testing computers running diferent soft, even SQL.
Following CPUs has similar price:
AMD Phenom II X2 560 3.3 GHz 7Mb
AMD Athlon II X4 640 3.0 GHz 2Mb
Which one is better for virtualization?
CPU 2 cores with more L3 cache or 4 cores?
Re: CPU 2 cores with more L3 cache or 4 cores?
More cache per cpu is better, but alot of quads these days have larger caches, up to 6mb/core.
[This space is intentionally left blank]
If you can read this, you can read the VirtualBox Manual, the Forum FAQ, and the QuickClick FAQ
-=[ Search this forum with Keywords, VirtualBox solutions at you're fingertips]=-
If you can read this, you can read the VirtualBox Manual, the Forum FAQ, and the QuickClick FAQ
-=[ Search this forum with Keywords, VirtualBox solutions at you're fingertips]=-
-
fixedwheel
- Volunteer
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: 13. Sep 2008, 02:18
Re: CPU 2 cores with more L3 cache or 4 cores?
depends on the workload, but thats how much i would run on a quad core. A dual core is ok for max. 2 guests IMHOvuser1 wrote:What is better for running several (3-5) VMs
Re: CPU 2 cores with more L3 cache or 4 cores?
Workload is not big. The only hard-loaded VM is network gateway. Other VMs are not loaded a lot. There ARE CPUs with 4 cores and 8Mb cache, but I believe I don't need to pay so much.
So, in my case:
- one VM is net gateway, loaded
- 2-4 VMs, not loaded so much
I know that VM eats CPU context switches even when idle. Which CPU is better?
So, in my case:
- one VM is net gateway, loaded
- 2-4 VMs, not loaded so much
I know that VM eats CPU context switches even when idle. Which CPU is better?