Host-Only versus Internal Networking
Posted: 10. Jun 2011, 16:13
This may be a simple question, but trying to make a decision as to which is the right configuration for me and need some advice as to which way to go.
From what I have read, the only "real" difference between Host-Only and Internal networking is that the VMs can talk to the Host and each other in Host-Only, while if Internal, the VMs can only talk to each other.
I find it interesting that with 4.x.x, the Host-Only DHCP server is configurable via the client interface in Preferences, yet Internal networks have to be configured from command line. Leave me to believe that Host-Only might be the recommended approach unless you have a specific reason why you would not want the Host to be able to see the network.
Comments?
Bruce.
From what I have read, the only "real" difference between Host-Only and Internal networking is that the VMs can talk to the Host and each other in Host-Only, while if Internal, the VMs can only talk to each other.
I find it interesting that with 4.x.x, the Host-Only DHCP server is configurable via the client interface in Preferences, yet Internal networks have to be configured from command line. Leave me to believe that Host-Only might be the recommended approach unless you have a specific reason why you would not want the Host to be able to see the network.
Comments?
Bruce.