Using common courtesy
Posted: 11. Apr 2011, 14:43
Rule n°1 : Don't lock topics. It has no purpose and his only leaded by laziness.
Rule n°2 : Answer something usefull to people.
Rule n°3 : Don't do stupid shortcuts by thinking that if a guy is posting about a portable version of a software, the link of a bug he gave is from a portable version. It is not, neither my topic on this bug tracker forum. Just a guy I found who has the same problem of RAM limitation.
Rule n°4 : Instead of blaming people for using unofficial portable version of your software, move your ass and release a portable version. We are in 2011, if you haven't understand yet that portable software are way more pratictal than setups, you're not in position to blame people.
Rule n°5 : there is no MAJOR problem making a portable version, just MINOR problems like the one I talked about (the virtual machine path rewrited at each opening of the soft).
Now you made me losing my time by thinking I could communicate with you, devs, on a forum wich is a communication tool. If you're unable to be sympathetic, just add a message on the top of the forum, in bold and red, that say :
WE WON'T WASTE OUR TIME WITH YOU, SO DON'T WASTE YOURS, DON'T WRITE ANYTHING, MOREOVER ABOUT A PORTABLE VERSION THAT IS STRICTLY IDENTICAL WITH OURS BUT HAVE JUST A DIFFERENT LAUNCHER!
And what about talking with "the guy" who did this portable version?
I won't waste my time anymore by waiting an answer from you. Adios.
Rule n°2 : Answer something usefull to people.
Rule n°3 : Don't do stupid shortcuts by thinking that if a guy is posting about a portable version of a software, the link of a bug he gave is from a portable version. It is not, neither my topic on this bug tracker forum. Just a guy I found who has the same problem of RAM limitation.
Rule n°4 : Instead of blaming people for using unofficial portable version of your software, move your ass and release a portable version. We are in 2011, if you haven't understand yet that portable software are way more pratictal than setups, you're not in position to blame people.
Rule n°5 : there is no MAJOR problem making a portable version, just MINOR problems like the one I talked about (the virtual machine path rewrited at each opening of the soft).
Now you made me losing my time by thinking I could communicate with you, devs, on a forum wich is a communication tool. If you're unable to be sympathetic, just add a message on the top of the forum, in bold and red, that say :
WE WON'T WASTE OUR TIME WITH YOU, SO DON'T WASTE YOURS, DON'T WRITE ANYTHING, MOREOVER ABOUT A PORTABLE VERSION THAT IS STRICTLY IDENTICAL WITH OURS BUT HAVE JUST A DIFFERENT LAUNCHER!
And what about talking with "the guy" who did this portable version?
I won't waste my time anymore by waiting an answer from you. Adios.