Portable 500gb hard drive now only shows 488 megs RAW.

Discussions about using Windows guests in VirtualBox.
Post Reply
chrisyroid
Posts: 1
Joined: 9. Apr 2011, 23:14
Primary OS: MS Windows 7
VBox Version: OSE other
Guest OSses: Windows XP

Portable 500gb hard drive now only shows 488 megs RAW.

Post by chrisyroid »

I don't know where to post this so forgive me.
Seeing that this problem was created with VB I thought it would be a good idea to post it in these forums.

I was experimenting with trying to get VirtualBox to see a USB drive as a hard disk. I told VB to look for a vmdk file on my hard drive that I created. That file pointed to the drive number on my system. I set it to "6" and when I plugged in my SATA drive the number unknowingly changed to "7" I ran VB and tried to format the USB flash drive (now the 500gb portable hard drive) and attempted to format it. It failed. I didn't notice what I had done until I had unplugged the 500gb drive and plugged it back in. That's when Windows told me the drive wasn't formated. I checked disk management and saw that only 488 megs was identified as RAW and the rest was unallocated. I'm wondering if I can recover from this disaster as I had a boat load of data on it.

The drive and the data it's self were completely usable up until I unplugged it and plugged it back in. In fact I had Steam running on it while I was unknowingly messing it up.
BillG
Volunteer
Posts: 5106
Joined: 19. Sep 2009, 04:44
Primary OS: MS Windows 10
VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
Guest OSses: Windows 10,7 and earlier
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Portable 500gb hard drive now only shows 488 megs RAW.

Post by BillG »

It really does not matter what program you were using. If you have formatted the drive, the data which was was previously on the drive is unavailable.All format utilities that I know of warn you of that. Even if the format failed to complete, you have probably destroyed the old master file table. Recovery is usually expensive and unreliable.
Bill
stefan.becker
Volunteer
Posts: 7639
Joined: 7. Jun 2007, 21:53

Re: Portable 500gb hard drive now only shows 488 megs RAW.

Post by stefan.becker »

Recover via Backup.

If you have no Backup, that were not important data.

For the future: Better use vdi files on a real harddisk. Or use Shared Folders to access Partitions.

Raw Disc Access is only a function for people exact knowing what they do. And for people with Backup.
Sasquatch
Volunteer
Posts: 17798
Joined: 17. Mar 2008, 13:41
Primary OS: Debian other
VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
Guest OSses: Windows XP, Windows 7, Linux
Location: /dev/random

Re: Portable 500gb hard drive now only shows 488 megs RAW.

Post by Sasquatch »

You should have read the warning more careful:
Warning
Raw hard disk access is for expert users only. Incorrect use or use of an outdated configuration can lead to total loss of data on the physical disk. Most importantly, do not attempt to boot the partition with the currently running host operating system in a guest. This will lead to severe data corruption.
Read the Forum Posting Guide before opening a topic.
VirtualBox FAQ: Check this before asking questions.
Online User Manual: A must read if you want to know what we're talking about.
Howto: Install Linux Guest Additions
Howto: Use Shared Folders on Linux Guest
See the Tutorials and FAQ section at the top of the Forum for more guides.
Try searching the forums first with Google and add the site filter for this forum.
E.g. install guest additions site:forums.virtualbox.org

Retired from this Forum since OSSO introduction.
mpack
Site Moderator
Posts: 39134
Joined: 4. Sep 2008, 17:09
Primary OS: MS Windows 10
VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
Guest OSses: Mostly XP

Re: Portable 500gb hard drive now only shows 488 megs RAW.

Post by mpack »

stefan.becker wrote:Raw Disc Access is only a function for people exact knowing what they do. And for people with Backup.
And even the people who know exactly what they are doing still worry about the consequences of making a mistake like the one described here: and look for a safer solution. In this case the safer solution would have been a VDI file or a shared folder, either one stored on the intended external drive. Raw access was never needed and was always an invitation for disaster.

Sorry to be so unsympathetic, but I find it exasperating that so many newbies seem to head directly for the raw access feature despite all warnings.
Post Reply