Hi, I have a primary Ubuntu server host with 3 guest ubuntu servers.
and
I have second ubuntu server which main purpose is to be the backup if the first one breaks. This will also be a virtualbox host, configured to run the 3 guests if the primary server breaks.
(I know it's a cheap setup, but much cheaper than an expensive raid with dual PSU etc...)
Now what would be the best solution:
1. Have both 3x guests running on both servers and individually rsync within guests to guests servers?
2. Running a daily/hourly savestate and clone the guest vdi's to the backup server? (one of the vdi is +100gb)
3. a better solution?
Backup rsync or clone?
-
thomasjohansen
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 9. May 2008, 09:39
- Primary OS: Ubuntu other
- VBox Version: OSE Debian
- Guest OSses: ubuntu, w2000, xp
- Location: Denmark, Koege
Re: Backup rsync or clone?
rsync is pretty good for this, alot of nas devices have this buildin.
[This space is intentionally left blank]
If you can read this, you can read the VirtualBox Manual, the Forum FAQ, and the QuickClick FAQ
-=[ Search this forum with Keywords, VirtualBox solutions at you're fingertips]=-
If you can read this, you can read the VirtualBox Manual, the Forum FAQ, and the QuickClick FAQ
-=[ Search this forum with Keywords, VirtualBox solutions at you're fingertips]=-
-
HubTou
- Posts: 93
- Joined: 24. Nov 2009, 11:01
- Primary OS: FreeBSD
- VBox Version: OSE other
- Guest OSses: FreeBSD, OpenSolaris, and several Linuxes
Re: Backup rsync or clone?
Hello,
Some suggestions:
Hubert
Some suggestions:
- if you have many files to backup inside your guests, instead of a few big ones (eg databases), have a look at BackupPC (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/), a very nice open source backup solution, with deduplication, automation, and many restoration options
- you might want to install your guests on several virtual disks. For example, one for the system, one for tmp/swap files, one for data. Thus, you would be able to have the first two ready on the other host, and some sort of synchronization for the third one
- maybe you can have something like HAST in FreeBSD (http://wiki.freebsd.org/HAST) for host to host synchronization
Hubert