IDE vs SATA vs SCSI vs SAS
Posted: 5. Nov 2010, 08:34
Hi all,
I've install 4 guests (windows 7 x86 with default drivers included in, 1024 MB RAM, 20 GB HDD, 1 CPU 1 Core) with 4 mode HDD (IDE, SATA, SCSI, SAS). My host computer is Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300, 4096MB (2 x 2048 DDR2-SDRAM), Seagate ST3320613AS ATA Device (320GB). I use CrystalDiskMark3_0_0h to benchmark guest's HDD. Here is the result:
Side by side compare
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/4339/allxb.png
or
http://www.mediafire.com/i/?pso4w88u445a6wz
IDE
http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/7789/idew.png
or
http://www.mediafire.com/i/?y5q5qaqco5tskyc
SAS
http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/7901/sasb.png
or
http://www.mediafire.com/i/?u7uyurojaxyc8j9
SATA
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/3807/satad.png
or
http://www.mediafire.com/i/?kkatr5j3b0uv38e
SCSI
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/4835/scsi.png
or
http://www.mediafire.com/i/?xgo4c5ujcgi259l
I've install 4 guests (windows 7 x86 with default drivers included in, 1024 MB RAM, 20 GB HDD, 1 CPU 1 Core) with 4 mode HDD (IDE, SATA, SCSI, SAS). My host computer is Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300, 4096MB (2 x 2048 DDR2-SDRAM), Seagate ST3320613AS ATA Device (320GB). I use CrystalDiskMark3_0_0h to benchmark guest's HDD. Here is the result:
Side by side compare
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/4339/allxb.png
or
http://www.mediafire.com/i/?pso4w88u445a6wz
IDE
http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/7789/idew.png
or
http://www.mediafire.com/i/?y5q5qaqco5tskyc
SAS
http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/7901/sasb.png
or
http://www.mediafire.com/i/?u7uyurojaxyc8j9
SATA
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/3807/satad.png
or
http://www.mediafire.com/i/?kkatr5j3b0uv38e
SCSI
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/4835/scsi.png
or
http://www.mediafire.com/i/?xgo4c5ujcgi259l