I have installed VB on a Windows XP host whith a Ubuntu 9.10 guest recently. I can't get the internet connection to work though. I've tried NAT and Bridged networking and on both I get the same problem. I can ping various addresses like yahoo etc and i can connect to my router all the time, but it seems like the internet connection is very unstable and interrupting all the time. Sometimes I manage to load google, but most of the time it just times out.
I think that this might have something to do whith my Adsl router to do. It has NAT and Firewall services and I think that it might somehow not work with the Ubuntu guest. On the host the internet is working like always.
If someone has an Idea on what this might be and how I could solve this I'd be very glad.
best regards
Simon
Internet connection issues in Ubuntu 9.10
-
whit
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 20. Mar 2010, 20:39
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
- Guest OSses: Ubuntu 10.04
Re: Internet connection issues in Ubuntu 9.10
Is this wired or wireless? What have you set up for networking within the Ubuntu guest? What does your /etc/network/interfaces file have in it? What do you see in Ubuntu with "ip addr ls" and "ip ro ls"? In your VB "Network Adapters" setup do you have "Cable connected" checked or not? What does your /etc/resolv.conf file contain? Is there firewall software running on your host?
Knowing all that may or may not clarify where the problem is.
Knowing all that may or may not clarify where the problem is.
-
Skutti
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 28. Mar 2010, 14:11
- Primary OS: MS Windows XP
- VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
- Guest OSses: Linux Ubuntu 9.10
Re: Internet connection issues in Ubuntu 9.10
It's wired and my host has a firewall but I've turned it off for now.
/etc/network/interfaces contains :
This appears whith " ip addr ls"
This appears whith "ip ro ls"
I have Cable connected checked and the /etc/resolv.conf file contains:
/etc/network/interfaces contains :
Code: Select all
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
Code: Select all
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:0d:0d:6a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.0.2.15/24 brd 10.0.2.255 scope global eth0
inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:fe0d:d6a/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
Code: Select all
10.0.2.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.2.15 metric 1
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
default via 10.0.2.2 dev eth0 proto static Code: Select all
# Generated by NetworkManager
nameserver 192.168.1.1-
whit
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 20. Mar 2010, 20:39
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
- Guest OSses: Ubuntu 10.04
Re: Internet connection issues in Ubuntu 9.10
Since you're connecting on eth0, you might want an entry for that something likeSkutti wrote:It's wired and my host has a firewall but I've turned it off for now.
/etc/network/interfaces contains :Code: Select all
auto lo iface lo inet loopback
Code: Select all
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
So you're using the NAT setting in VB, right?
That looks right for VB NAT.This appears whith "ip ro ls"Code: Select all
10.0.2.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.2.15 metric 1 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000 default via 10.0.2.2 dev eth0 proto static
Does your router at 192.168.1.1 have a nameserver running? If you do "dig @192.168.1.1 somedomain.com" does it answer?I have Cable connected checked and the /etc/resolv.conf file contains:
Code: Select all
# Generated by NetworkManager nameserver 192.168.1.1
Do you have better luck (I have - but my problems weren't so severe) if you go to "Bridged Adapter"? You may need to establish a new DHCP lease after making that switch (e.g. either "dhclient" or if your /etc/network/interfaces file is set up for the interface "ifdown eth0;ifup eth0".
-
Skutti
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 28. Mar 2010, 14:11
- Primary OS: MS Windows XP
- VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
- Guest OSses: Linux Ubuntu 9.10
Re: Internet connection issues in Ubuntu 9.10
Thank you for your reply.
I added the lines that you suggested to the interfaces file but it still didnt work
The only thing that happened was that I couldnt press the "edit" button in "network connections". I tried dhclient aswell.
Then I tried switching to Bridge. I'm not sure what you mean whith "ifdown eth0;ifup eth0" but I ran dhclient. I can ping and I can see the new IP address in my router. But I can't connect to the internet through the browser and I can't download the update packages for Ubuntu. I have no idea what the problem is and I'm out of ideas..
I added the lines that you suggested to the interfaces file but it still didnt work
Then I tried switching to Bridge. I'm not sure what you mean whith "ifdown eth0;ifup eth0" but I ran dhclient. I can ping and I can see the new IP address in my router. But I can't connect to the internet through the browser and I can't download the update packages for Ubuntu. I have no idea what the problem is and I'm out of ideas..
-
whit
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 20. Mar 2010, 20:39
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: VirtualBox+Oracle ExtPack
- Guest OSses: Ubuntu 10.04
Re: Internet connection issues in Ubuntu 9.10
Sorry that didn't help. You might be right that it's something problematic in your ADSL device. If, for instance, it doesn't tolerate two separate IPs at the same MAC address, it could foul up bridged mode. And it could be doing NAT in a way that conflicts with VB's own NAT - I seem to see some conflict between VB's NATing and the NATing my Linux router here does on stuff leaving the LAN, not as much as you're reporting, but it does look like different NAT implementations can fail to work well when one's behind another.
Does your ADSL router also offer a bridged mode? If you can reset it to bridged, and then go back to NAT on the VB setup, then at least you wouldn't have potential conflict between the two NAT implementations. (I have an SDSL router bridged here, the other side of my Linux router.) If you do go to bridged mode on the router with a Windows host, though, the host will be more exposed, so you'd want to make sure that firewalling is in place, whether on the router or within Windows.
Does your ADSL router also offer a bridged mode? If you can reset it to bridged, and then go back to NAT on the VB setup, then at least you wouldn't have potential conflict between the two NAT implementations. (I have an SDSL router bridged here, the other side of my Linux router.) If you do go to bridged mode on the router with a Windows host, though, the host will be more exposed, so you'd want to make sure that firewalling is in place, whether on the router or within Windows.