Virtualbox 3.0.10?

x-Na · Post by **x-Na** » 29. Oct 2009, 11:08

Why my apt-get is suggesting Virtualbox 3.0.10, but site itself doesn't say anything about it?

redxii · Post by **redxii** » 29. Oct 2009, 11:13

It was briefly on the download page, I didn't see a changelog so I didn't dl it. They musta pulled it.

x-Na · Post by **x-Na** » 29. Oct 2009, 11:15

redxii wrote:It was briefly on the download page, I didn't see a changelog so I didn't dl it. They musta pulled it.

Packages are still available, though

Post by **Sasquatch** » 29. Oct 2009, 11:40

It's a test run. There are still quite some issues, so I suggest you don't upgrade. Especially if you have Windows Guests, no hardware-V options and enabled I/O APIC for them.

issotyo · Post by **issotyo** » 29. Oct 2009, 11:58

Sasquatch wrote:It's a test run. There are still quite some issues, so I suggest you don't upgrade. Especially if you have Windows Guests, no hardware-V options and enabled I/O APIC for them.

I think so, been there done that

Host linux, win guest, meet meditation guru at once, hehehe my fault being so careless...

Post by **Sasquatch** » 29. Oct 2009, 12:03

Just a few more hours, then a fixed version should be out.

Post by **sej7278** » 29. Oct 2009, 12:15

well i've installed and running 3.0.10 on fedora10 via the yum repo it seems to be running win2k3 ok, but will the new version be 3.0.11 or be confusing and have the same release number?

Post by **Sasquatch** » 29. Oct 2009, 12:16

Same release number, different build. Problem is software virtualization, so if you have VT-x or AMD-v on, you're not having much problems.

virtualbox.org

Virtualbox 3.0.10?

Virtualbox 3.0.10?

Re: Virtualbox 3.0.10?

Re: Virtualbox 3.0.10?

Re: Virtualbox 3.0.10?

Re: Virtualbox 3.0.10?

Re: Virtualbox 3.0.10?

Re: Virtualbox 3.0.10?

Re: Virtualbox 3.0.10?