"folder sharing" vs. shared partitions?
Posted: 26. Oct 2009, 04:55
what is wrong with both the host and vm simply accessing the same partition?
i.e., both linux host and vista vm accessing /dev/hdb1 with read/write access?
i mean, it works - i'm doing it now and i didnt set up anything w/ the "shared folders" feature in vbox...is there some downside to this approach?
i would think the host os controls all read/write actions to the partition in question, and will know how to deal with concurrent requests that come from the vm and lock it out if the host has a file open/locked (or vice versa if the vm has a file opened/locked).
i found this thread...which touches on the topic...http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic. ... are#p44557
i probably need to double-check to see if both the host and vm mounting/accessing teh same partition is actually allowing read/write from the vm on my machine. i did see files, but didnt check the writing to the filesystem.
i.e., both linux host and vista vm accessing /dev/hdb1 with read/write access?
i mean, it works - i'm doing it now and i didnt set up anything w/ the "shared folders" feature in vbox...is there some downside to this approach?
i would think the host os controls all read/write actions to the partition in question, and will know how to deal with concurrent requests that come from the vm and lock it out if the host has a file open/locked (or vice versa if the vm has a file opened/locked).
i found this thread...which touches on the topic...http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic. ... are#p44557
i probably need to double-check to see if both the host and vm mounting/accessing teh same partition is actually allowing read/write from the vm on my machine. i did see files, but didnt check the writing to the filesystem.