eth0 Does Not Show Up In Some Installations
Posted: 26. Aug 2009, 13:31
Hello All
Perhaps the title does not summarise well what i am experiencing so here is the problem:
I have installed Virtual Box (VB) on a machine (Let's call it System A) with WinXP as the host and a basic installation of Debian as the guest operating system.
In this installation i have two interfaces enabled, eth0 and eth1. eth0 is NATed and provides internet access to the host (which i only need for installing some additional packages), eth1 is set to the 'Internal Network' mode and gets assigned the IP: 192.168.56.2. Once up, this enables the host operating system to connect to whatever servers run on the guest OS through this network.
The image for this installation was put on a USB disk. I then moved to another system running WinXP (Let's call this System B), installed VB, created a virtual machine and pointed it to the.vdi on my portable USB disk.
In this case, the guest OS boots normally but only eth1 shows up. eth0 acts as if it is not even present (device not found kind of message). On the other hand, eth1 seems to be behaving normally but once up it can not even ping the host OS giving the error that the network is unreachable (they both are on the same network, have the same network mask and VB shows the NIC as having it's...virtual cable, connected).
This exact same behaviour was also observed when i moved on to yet another machine (Let's call this one System C also running winXP). And this was the point when i decided to ask about this on this forum.
System A is an Intel 2.4GHz dual core with 4GB of memory, System B is a Dell Inspiron Laptop at 1.5Ghz with 512MB of memory, System C is an AMD Athlon 1.3GHz with 1GB of memory. All of them running WinXP as the host OS and are completely updated.
(As a note, the virtual installation was performing well even in the less capable systems where the CPU was peaking at about 65%. This was roughly tested at the host system with apache2, mysql and some scripts in python-django...)
Does this sound as a 'Virtualbox settings' or 'Host system hardware' problem?
Perhaps the title does not summarise well what i am experiencing so here is the problem:
I have installed Virtual Box (VB) on a machine (Let's call it System A) with WinXP as the host and a basic installation of Debian as the guest operating system.
In this installation i have two interfaces enabled, eth0 and eth1. eth0 is NATed and provides internet access to the host (which i only need for installing some additional packages), eth1 is set to the 'Internal Network' mode and gets assigned the IP: 192.168.56.2. Once up, this enables the host operating system to connect to whatever servers run on the guest OS through this network.
The image for this installation was put on a USB disk. I then moved to another system running WinXP (Let's call this System B), installed VB, created a virtual machine and pointed it to the.vdi on my portable USB disk.
In this case, the guest OS boots normally but only eth1 shows up. eth0 acts as if it is not even present (device not found kind of message). On the other hand, eth1 seems to be behaving normally but once up it can not even ping the host OS giving the error that the network is unreachable (they both are on the same network, have the same network mask and VB shows the NIC as having it's...virtual cable, connected).
This exact same behaviour was also observed when i moved on to yet another machine (Let's call this one System C also running winXP). And this was the point when i decided to ask about this on this forum.
System A is an Intel 2.4GHz dual core with 4GB of memory, System B is a Dell Inspiron Laptop at 1.5Ghz with 512MB of memory, System C is an AMD Athlon 1.3GHz with 1GB of memory. All of them running WinXP as the host OS and are completely updated.
(As a note, the virtual installation was performing well even in the less capable systems where the CPU was peaking at about 65%. This was roughly tested at the host system with apache2, mysql and some scripts in python-django...)
Does this sound as a 'Virtualbox settings' or 'Host system hardware' problem?