vbox4me2 wrote:
You are confusing two different items, raw is an access feature, emulated hardware is another thing. a VM does not care where its partition comes from as long as it can access it, the OS inside a VM does care about the hardware it needs to do its things with, windows is alot more sensative to such hardware changes which often leads into a black screen or other BSOD's. these issues have nothing to do with raw access.
Ok, this makes sense. Maybe you could continue to clarify my situation.
What I want to achieve is: Have a Windows XP installation on a partition, and be able to (1) both boot directly that Windows and (2) boot that same Windows inside a VirtualBox running under Linux. (Ideally I could manage to use my existing Windows installation, but if it changes things I can also reinstall that Windows.) Obviously I cannot use the *very* same installation but need some kind of exclusively dedicated parts of limited size like hardware profiles or file system subtrees which are automatically switched during boot sequence.
What I want to avoid is the need for effectively two parallel Windows installations (one on a partition for direct boot and another in a Linux file for booting from VirtualBox). The reason for that is that my maintenance effort (Windows software update and configuration) would be doubled then, and since some online-activated software would count this as two different licenses, I'd have to pay double fees.
I believe that I have read reports from users that they have been successfully doing this. Is virtualbox.org intending to support this kind of application in general? Can I try any further steps on my machine to make it work here? Do I need other products than virtualbox.org? Are there any other suggested approaches, like having two independent Windows installations with only very tiny kernel like content and all user files and program insteallations on a third partition which is shared between the true and the faked Windows?