Page 1 of 1
Really ! 2TB/s Bandwidth for Cache/Memory.
Posted: 22. Jul 2009, 05:36
by chkuo11b
Re: Really ! 2TB/s Bandwidth for Cache/Memory.
Posted: 22. Jul 2009, 15:24
by TerryE
Sorry but the graphic is unreadable and my Mandarin isn't to good either. What's your point?
Re: Really ! 2TB/s Bandwidth for Cache/Memory.
Posted: 22. Jul 2009, 16:29
by mpack
TerryE wrote:my Mandarin isn't to good either.
Here's my chance for spot of a pedantry

You can't call it Mandarin. The Chinese written language is separate and distinct from any of the several spoken languages.
Re: Really ! 2TB/s Bandwidth for Cache/Memory.
Posted: 22. Jul 2009, 16:57
by TerryE
True, but the two fonts are called Mandarin(simple) and Mandarin (Traditional), though looking Jen-Hao's post, he is from Taipei. In fact I zoomed in on this one and it's a SiSofware Sandra benchmark. Look's like a benchmark gremlin because the suite is getting confused by the VM.
Re: Really ! 2TB/s Bandwidth for Cache/Memory.
Posted: 22. Jul 2009, 20:10
by chkuo11b
It is amazing that Jen-Hao is able to do " 2 TB/s " Value with benchmark. Is it Virutalbox bug or not ?
Also would like to see : What is the benchmark result running on Host OS ?
-- Rex
Re: Really ! 2TB/s Bandwidth for Cache/Memory.
Posted: 23. Jul 2009, 00:34
by TerryE
Rex, the referenced rates of tens Gb / sec is the best that can be achieved. I think that we will need to wait for Graphene based processors to see Tb / sec bandwidths so come back in 10-15 years. Of course its a bug. Durrrh! This a physical impossibility with current technology. Would I call it a VBox bug, probably not, though it might be a side effect of the RTC running slow.