Really ! 2TB/s Bandwidth for Cache/Memory.

[chkuo11b]

Take a look.

http://molesterwaterball.blogspot.com/2 ... tborz.html .

Best Regards,
-- Rex

[TerryE]

Sorry but the graphic is unreadable and my Mandarin isn't to good either. What's your point?

[mpack]

my Mandarin isn't to good either.

Here's my chance for spot of a pedantry You can't call it Mandarin. The Chinese written language is separate and distinct from any of the several spoken languages.

[TerryE]

True, but the two fonts are called Mandarin(simple) and Mandarin (Traditional), though looking Jen-Hao's post, he is from Taipei. In fact I zoomed in on this one and it's a SiSofware Sandra benchmark. Look's like a benchmark gremlin because the suite is getting confused by the VM.

[chkuo11b]

It is amazing that Jen-Hao is able to do " 2 TB/s " Value with benchmark. Is it Virutalbox bug or not ?

Also would like to see : What is the benchmark result running on Host OS ?

-- Rex

[TerryE]

Rex, the referenced rates of tens Gb / sec is the best that can be achieved. I think that we will need to wait for Graphene based processors to see Tb / sec bandwidths so come back in 10-15 years. Of course its a bug. Durrrh! This a physical impossibility with current technology. Would I call it a VBox bug, probably not, though it might be a side effect of the RTC running slow.