Linux Host: Safe to create VM Guests on NTFS partition?
Posted: 30. Jun 2009, 03:57
My system:
- Ubuntu 8.04.2 Hardy Heron (2.6.24-24-generic)
- Installed VirtualBox v2.2.4 r47978 for HH8.04 .
- 4 Gb Ram with dual boot partitions:
- Vista: 180Gb free
- Linux: 110Gb free
- Ubuntu always mounts the NTFS via "fuseblk" mount.
I have a dual boot system with 110Gb on the Linux side and 180Gb (NTFS) on
the Vista side. I hardly ever use the Vista partition (but I still want
to keep a MS OS just in case) , and I thought one way to make use of the idle
NTFS disk is to create VM guests on the NTFS partition.
Questions:
1. Is it safe to create VMs on a mounted NTFS partition?
2. Is there a speed penalty for using fuseblk?
3. Has anyone done this before?
Thanks in advance,
AlexG
PS: VirtualBox is one of the best Open Source software that I've ever seen.
Thanks to the team who created and released it to the public. I am in sheer awe!
- Ubuntu 8.04.2 Hardy Heron (2.6.24-24-generic)
- Installed VirtualBox v2.2.4 r47978 for HH8.04 .
- 4 Gb Ram with dual boot partitions:
- Vista: 180Gb free
- Linux: 110Gb free
- Ubuntu always mounts the NTFS via "fuseblk" mount.
I have a dual boot system with 110Gb on the Linux side and 180Gb (NTFS) on
the Vista side. I hardly ever use the Vista partition (but I still want
to keep a MS OS just in case) , and I thought one way to make use of the idle
NTFS disk is to create VM guests on the NTFS partition.
Questions:
1. Is it safe to create VMs on a mounted NTFS partition?
2. Is there a speed penalty for using fuseblk?
3. Has anyone done this before?
Thanks in advance,
AlexG
PS: VirtualBox is one of the best Open Source software that I've ever seen.
Thanks to the team who created and released it to the public. I am in sheer awe!