XP guest performance - raw partition or file?
Posted: 18. Feb 2009, 19:46
Hello all,
I'm wondering how to get useable performance from an XP virtual machine inside linux. The only reason I want XP is to use Macromedia Flash.
I'm using Virtualbox 2.1.4 in ubuntu on an Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo T7100 @ 1.80GHz, with 2Gb ram, running XP from the raw (SATA) partition with about 800Mb of ram. It's just not fast enough.
Would it be quicker to run XP from a file image instead of the raw partition?
TIA,
Tom
I'm wondering how to get useable performance from an XP virtual machine inside linux. The only reason I want XP is to use Macromedia Flash.
I'm using Virtualbox 2.1.4 in ubuntu on an Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo T7100 @ 1.80GHz, with 2Gb ram, running XP from the raw (SATA) partition with about 800Mb of ram. It's just not fast enough.
Would it be quicker to run XP from a file image instead of the raw partition?
TIA,
Tom