Page 1 of 1
Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 4. Mar 2022, 23:02
by vooyeQ
Hi there,
Struggling to mount physical drive on VM.
Any clues appreciated.
Host: Windows 10.
Guest: Linux.
Disk changed to offline in Disk Management.
All commands as well as VirtualBox itself executed in PowerShell with administrator rights.
Disk is fine, able to boot using real hardware.
PowerShell:
Code: Select all
PS C:\Program Files\Oracle\VirtualBox> ./VBoxManage internalcommands createrawvmdk -filename "i:/gentoo_physical.vmdk" -rawdisk //./PhysicalDrive3
RAW host disk access VMDK file i:/gentoo_physical.vmdk created successfully.
PS C:\Program Files\Oracle\VirtualBox> ./VirtualBox.exe
Tried to add file using Virtual Media Manager, error:
Code: Select all
Failed to open the disk image file I:\gentoo_physical.vmdk.
Could not find file for the medium 'I:\gentoo_physical.vmdk' (VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND).
Result Code: VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR (0x80BB0004)
Component: MediumWrap
Interface: IMedium {ad47ad09-787b-44ab-b343-a082a3f2dfb1}
Callee: IVirtualBox {d0a0163f-e254-4e5b-a1f2-011cf991c38d}
Callee RC: VBOX_E_OBJECT_NOT_FOUND (0x80BB0001)
gentoo_physical.vmdk contents:
Code: Select all
# Disk DescriptorFile
version=1
CID=973eea21
parentCID=ffffffff
createType="fullDevice"
# Extent description
RW 78165360 FLAT "//./PhysicalDrive3" 0
# The disk Data Base
#DDB
ddb.virtualHWVersion = "4"
ddb.adapterType="ide"
ddb.geometry.cylinders="16383"
ddb.geometry.heads="16"
ddb.geometry.sectors="63"
ddb.uuid.image="b30bf6f0-6e2b-4714-b5af-b4256eaf7175"
ddb.uuid.parent="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"
ddb.uuid.modification="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"
ddb.uuid.parentmodification="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"
Thanks,
vQ
Re: Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 5. Mar 2022, 04:23
by scottgus1
vooyeQ wrote:Could not find file for the medium 'I:\gentoo_physical.vmdk' (VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND).
The .vmdk is in the root folder of the I: drive. Drive roots have special permissions in modern Windows. Try putting the .vmdk in a subfolder on the I: drive. Since the file is so small it could actually go in the folder that holds the VM's .vbox file, instead.
Re: Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 5. Mar 2022, 10:49
by vooyeQ
Same result.
Re: Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 5. Mar 2022, 16:22
by scottgus1
When the result is the same, that should be backed up with some evidence, such as the error message that happened. Otherwise forum gurus might think the suggestion was not followed correctly. Which happens a surprisingly large portion of the time.
Especially when the suggestion was actually two suggestions: I: subfolder, and the VM folder.
Also, is the I drive a physical drive or partition in a physical drive, or is it a mounted shared folder? Running a program as Admin is known to not allow access to previously-accessible drive-letter-mounted network folders, because the mounting instructions are inherent to the account the mount was made under, and running as admin is actually a different account.
Re: Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 5. Mar 2022, 16:24
by fth0
Try using "\\.\PhysicalDrive3" instead of "//./PhysicalDrive3".
Re: Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 5. Mar 2022, 19:56
by vooyeQ
fth0 wrote:Try using "\\.\PhysicalDrive3" instead of "//./PhysicalDrive3".
Thank You, that was it.
scottgus1 wrote:When the result is the same, that should be backed up with some evidence, such as the error message that happened. Otherwise forum gurus might think the suggestion was not followed correctly. Which happens a surprisingly large portion of the time.
Regarding lack of effort
, even tried to provide screenshots, but as a newcomer I wasn't allowed to
Anyways, using fth0's tip tried 3 paths, all of them worked:
- root dir ( well VBoxManage was able to create VMDK file in root so "should" be able to read it )
- root dir/subfolder:
- VM's folder with blanks/spaces and underscores in path:
Code: Select all
i:\_VBOX_\gentoo zlom new\gentoo_zlom\gentoo_physical.vmdk
I:\ is a physical drive.
--
Thanks.
Re: Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 6. Mar 2022, 01:02
by scottgus1
vooyeQ wrote:tried to provide screenshots, but as a newcomer I wasn't allowed to
Pictures can be posted using the forum's Upload Attachment tab on the first day first post.
Text output of an error message like the error message you posted before counts as evidence:
vooyeQ wrote:Code: Select all
Failed to open the disk image file I:\gentoo_physical.vmdk.
Could not find file for the medium 'I:\gentoo_physical.vmdk' (VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND).
And no screenshot needed.
vooyeQ wrote:fth0 wrote:Try using "\\.\PhysicalDrive3" instead of "//./PhysicalDrive3".
Thank You, that was it.
Ah yes, good ol' syntax error. Sounds like the VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND was pointing at the failure to find the drive, not failing to find the drive file... Will have to remember that.
Good eye fth0!
Glad you're up and running, vooyeQ!
Re: Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 6. Mar 2022, 10:15
by fth0
scottgus1 wrote:vooyeQ wrote:fth0 wrote:Try using "\\.\PhysicalDrive3" instead of "//./PhysicalDrive3".
Thank You, that was it.
Ah yes, good ol' syntax error. Sounds like the VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND was pointing at the failure to find the drive, not failing to find the drive file... Will have to remember that.
Some additional details:
For compatibility with shells of other OSes (e.g. Linux), the Windows
PowerShell accepts device names and file system paths written with the "\" and "/" separators. VirtualBox doesn't do that on Windows hosts (at least not consistently).
Re: Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 6. Mar 2022, 10:47
by mpack
fth0 wrote:VirtualBox doesn't do that on Windows hosts (at least not consistently).
As you say, not consistently, i.e. some parts do it and some don't. If you look at the media paths in pretty much any .vbox file you will very likely see a mix of path separators (though most are '/'). Because of this I would never have detected the above typo because I've been trained to regard the difference as unimportant! I'm still surprised that it is treated as an error... in fact it may be worth raising a BugTracker ticket for this.
It may have something to do with "\\.\" being regarded as a device name prefix, not a path.
Re: Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 6. Mar 2022, 12:30
by vooyeQ
Yup, looks like some inconsistency there.
VBoxManage accepts "//./" prefix while main app does not.
scottgus1 wrote:Pictures can be posted using the forum's Upload Attachment tab on the first day first post.
True, tried to insert links to images not the images themselves.
Re: Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 6. Mar 2022, 16:08
by mpack
vooyeQ wrote:
VBoxManage accepts "//./" prefix while main app does not.
It looks to me like the other way around: the main app (VBoxManage) accepts "//./", it's the VMDK handler which does not. Possibly that code was donated by VMWare, or the devs used the VMWare SDK.
A simple fix btw would just have been to edit the teeny vmdk text descriptor to correct the device name of the raw extent.
Re: Physical drive + Admin rights = VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
Posted: 6. Mar 2022, 17:27
by fth0
FWIW, it's indeed in the VMDK handling code, see
VMDK.cpp?rev=93115#L2916. The interesting part including some telltale comments begins in Line 2965 (RTPATH_SLASH is one of the host OS dependent constants).