virtualbox 6.1.48 vs 7.1.12

This is for discussing general topics about how to use VirtualBox.
Post Reply
lpmanjaro
Posts: 55
Joined: 13. May 2021, 18:51

virtualbox 6.1.48 vs 7.1.12

Post by lpmanjaro »

Actually my question is: Why are there 2 different releases of virtualbox? I've aways used 7.1.x and was wondering what the 6.1.x versions were used for? There must be a reason for 2 verision, right ?
mpack
Site Moderator
Posts: 39134
Joined: 4. Sep 2008, 17:09
Primary OS: MS Windows 10
VBox Version: PUEL
Guest OSses: Mostly XP

Re: virtualbox 6.1.48 vs 7.1.12

Post by mpack »

Why do software vendors ever provide two branches? The 6.1.48 release is the long term support version, for those who prefer stability over new features. The 6.1.x branch mainly gets bugfixes now.

I find it ironic that someone who embeds the word "Manjaro" in their handle would ask why we need multiple versions of any piece of software! :) Though possibly I'm incorrect in assuming that it's a reference to the Linux distro variant?
scottgus1
Site Moderator
Posts: 20945
Joined: 30. Dec 2009, 20:14
Primary OS: MS Windows 10
VBox Version: PUEL
Guest OSses: Windows, Linux

Re: virtualbox 6.1.48 vs 7.1.12

Post by scottgus1 »

Not to dogpile, but there's a couple data points to consider:
lpmanjaro wrote: 19. Oct 2023, 04:46 I've aways used 7.1.x
A: 7.1 doesn't exist yet. We're on 7.0.12 at this moment. :D
B: Your first post reported using 6.1.22. So not "always". :lol:

And like Mpack says, 6.1 is like Ubuntu's LTS. A stable channel for those who need existing things to work well instead of testing the new version and risking a breakage (of which there are always a few in a new major version).
lpmanjaro
Posts: 55
Joined: 13. May 2021, 18:51

Re: virtualbox 6.1.48 vs 7.1.12

Post by lpmanjaro »

mpack wrote: 19. Oct 2023, 10:55 Why do software vendors ever provide two branches? The 6.1.48 release is the long term support version, for those who prefer stability over new features. The 6.1.x branch mainly gets bugfixes now.

I find it ironic that someone who embeds the word "Manjaro" in their handle would ask why we need multiple versions of any piece of software! :) Though possibly I'm incorrect in assuming that it's a reference to the Linux distro variant?
Manjaro distro is my "go to OS" IE my host OS. So needing a unique ID and one I could remember.......
lpmanjaro
Posts: 55
Joined: 13. May 2021, 18:51

Re: virtualbox 6.1.48 vs 7.1.12

Post by lpmanjaro »

scottgus1 wrote: 19. Oct 2023, 13:31 Not to dogpile, but there's a couple data points to consider:
lpmanjaro wrote: 19. Oct 2023, 04:46 I've aways used 7.1.x
A: 7.1 doesn't exist yet. We're on 7.0.12 at this moment. :D
B: Your first post reported using 6.1.22. So not "always". :lol:

And like Mpack says, 6.1 is like Ubuntu's LTS. A stable channel for those who need existing things to work well instead of testing the new version and risking a breakage (of which there are always a few in a new major version).
Ops, got caught up in 6.1.x and simply typed 7.1., and of course your correct, it's 7.0.x......My bad...:-(
lpmanjaro
Posts: 55
Joined: 13. May 2021, 18:51

Re: virtualbox 6.1.48 vs 7.1.12

Post by lpmanjaro »

Thanks to all that contributed regarding LTS vs Rolling Releases. I like to play around with the latest distro's and I have enough memory and storage to run multiple vbox clients so LTS is not necessary. (Easily restored if things go awry. )
Post Reply