Level0 = Win 10, 64-bit, VBox 6.1.0-BETA1, Core i7 6600U
Level1 = Debian Linux 9, 64-bit + Linux-KVM. (Qemu/KVM is standard version from Debian 9)
Level2 = empty VM with Linux-KVM. Crash.
Nested VT-x crash with KVM
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 3342
- Joined: 10. May 2007, 16:59
- Location: Israel
Nested VT-x crash with KVM
- Attachments
-
- KVM crash screenshot.
- Nested VT-x KVM.png (112.44 KiB) Viewed 20604 times
-
- Debian 9 Workstation-2019-09-24-20-50-54.zip
- Level0, Debian 9, vbox.log
- (19.64 KiB) Downloaded 301 times
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 27329
- Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
- Primary OS: Mac OS X other
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
- Location: Greece
Re: Nested VT-x crash with KVM
Technologov,
There's no point in trying different exotic scenarios. Currently only VirtualBox (current) on VirtualBox (current) is supported AFAIK.
There's no point in trying different exotic scenarios. Currently only VirtualBox (current) on VirtualBox (current) is supported AFAIK.
Do NOT send me Personal Messages (PMs) for troubleshooting, they are simply deleted.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 3342
- Joined: 10. May 2007, 16:59
- Location: Israel
Re: Nested VT-x crash with KVM
>There's no point in trying different exotic scenarios. Currently only VirtualBox (current) on VirtualBox (current) is supported.
1. Running KVM in a Linux guest is not exotic at all. (just like running Hyper-V in a Windows guest is not exotic, and expected to work)
2. Where is it written that only this or that is supported ? Oracle claimed 'Nested VT-x is working and stable', not even experimental label. (reading chapter 14.1. Experimental Features)
1. Running KVM in a Linux guest is not exotic at all. (just like running Hyper-V in a Windows guest is not exotic, and expected to work)
2. Where is it written that only this or that is supported ? Oracle claimed 'Nested VT-x is working and stable', not even experimental label. (reading chapter 14.1. Experimental Features)
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 27329
- Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
- Primary OS: Mac OS X other
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
- Location: Greece
Re: Nested VT-x crash with KVM
By exotic I mean your previous post as well:
As I said, if you don't want to waste your time, stick with current VirtualBox on current VirtualBox... For the beginning at least.
VirtualBox 4.1.6 r74713 win.x86 (Nov 4 2011 13:40:24) release log
Rumors, from the horse's mouth...Technologov wrote:Where is it written that only this or that is supported ?
If anything, it's not stable and working. I've yet to see a working example. If you can point me to one, I'd appreciate it...Technologov wrote:Oracle claimed 'Nested VT-x is working and stable', not even experimental label
As I said, if you don't want to waste your time, stick with current VirtualBox on current VirtualBox... For the beginning at least.
Do NOT send me Personal Messages (PMs) for troubleshooting, they are simply deleted.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 3342
- Joined: 10. May 2007, 16:59
- Location: Israel
Re: Nested VT-x crash with KVM
'VirtualBox 4.1.6' -- yes, may sound exotic, but I took it for few reasons:
1. it officially supports 32-bit and Windows XP hosts.
2. It is _very well_ tested by me on various Intel CPUs and OSes (guest and host), and found to be stable version. So I know what to expect and how it worked on real hardware almost a decade ago...
3. I have it in my personal offline repository
1. it officially supports 32-bit and Windows XP hosts.
2. It is _very well_ tested by me on various Intel CPUs and OSes (guest and host), and found to be stable version. So I know what to expect and how it worked on real hardware almost a decade ago...
3. I have it in my personal offline repository