V5.2's Version mismatch.

Discussions about using Windows guests in VirtualBox.
Post Reply
isgdre
Posts: 23
Joined: 15. Nov 2012, 21:45

V5.2's Version mismatch.

Post by isgdre »

Version 5.2.0 r118431 (Qt5.6.2) has guest additions that report 5.2.1.118430.
What's really odd is 5.2.0 < 5.2.1 but 118431 > 118430
Does anyone know if this is ok?
socratis
Site Moderator
Posts: 27329
Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
Primary OS: Mac OS X other
VBox Version: PUEL
Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
Location: Greece

Re: V5.2's Version mismatch.

Post by socratis »

There seems to be an issue with the Windows VirtualBox distribution and the included Guest Additions CD.
Do NOT send me Personal Messages (PMs) for troubleshooting, they are simply deleted.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
michaln
Oracle Corporation
Posts: 2973
Joined: 19. Dec 2007, 15:45
Primary OS: MS Windows 7
VBox Version: PUEL
Guest OSses: Any and all
Contact:

Re: V5.2's Version mismatch.

Post by michaln »

isgdre: Could you please share with us which VirtualBox package exactly you installed?

The mismatch shouldn't be a problem, and the seemingly backward going revision numbers are just an artifact of some build process quirks.
isgdre
Posts: 23
Joined: 15. Nov 2012, 21:45

Re: V5.2's Version mismatch.

Post by isgdre »

The file name is VirtualBox-5.2.0-118431-Win.exe which I got from the big 5.2 download button on the www.virtualbox.org home page

I didn't download the guest additions separately.
socratis
Site Moderator
Posts: 27329
Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
Primary OS: Mac OS X other
VBox Version: PUEL
Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
Location: Greece

Re: V5.2's Version mismatch.

Post by socratis »

I can confirm that it's the Windows package that has the problem, with the Linux guest additions (so far). If you're on a Win host and try the GAs, you get a 5.2.1 version. It doesn't happen on OSX as a host.
Do NOT send me Personal Messages (PMs) for troubleshooting, they are simply deleted.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
klaus
Oracle Corporation
Posts: 1133
Joined: 10. May 2007, 14:57

Re: V5.2's Version mismatch.

Post by klaus »

At least the Windows package is affected, and I don't yet understand why our normal logic for forcing consistent builds has failed for 5.2.0.
klaus
Oracle Corporation
Posts: 1133
Joined: 10. May 2007, 14:57

Re: V5.2's Version mismatch.

Post by klaus »

Staring at the last changes in this area finally solved the riddle. A recent change completely sabotaged the logic which forced a consistent build, and no one noticed because it sabotaged a condition check without a warning.
isgdre
Posts: 23
Joined: 15. Nov 2012, 21:45

Re: V5.2's Version mismatch.

Post by isgdre »

Ok, So I understand it's not big deal and should work properly. Just a version labeling problem in the build and likely will be fixed for the next version.

Thanks guys.
klaus
Oracle Corporation
Posts: 1133
Joined: 10. May 2007, 14:57

Re: V5.2's Version mismatch.

Post by klaus »

Correct - the issue is purely cosmetic, shipping guest additions which have a strange version number. The actual code is the correct one (in some sense, these guest additions were not working with Linux, for that you'll need to fetch the test build, labeled development).
Post Reply