Discuss the 5.1.30 release
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 27329
- Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
- Primary OS: Mac OS X other
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
- Location: Greece
Discuss the 5.1.30 release
Discuss the 5.1.30 release here.
You can download the release here.
Mainly a regression-fix release for 5.1.28.
You can download the release here.
Mainly a regression-fix release for 5.1.28.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: 21. Mar 2014, 02:15
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Windows, DOS, Linux
- Location: Reading. Berkshire. UK.
- Contact:
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
No, apparently that's not the explanation.BrianG61UK wrote:I've fixed it by updating the driver for the network card on the host PC.BrianG61UK wrote:I use a Windows 7 64 bit host to run VirtualBox 5.1.28.
I'm running 32 bit Windows 7 in a VM.
I noticed this evening that Network "Bridged Adapter" isn't working right, I can't download anything from inside the VM though ping seems to work fine.
Possibly it's since installing the WIndows updates today.
I've changed to "NAT" for now.
I must have previously updated it to a buggy version.
Something bizarre is going on.
I have absolutely no idea what I did that suddenly made it start working.
In fact now I have upgraded to 5.1.30 and fiddled around uninstalling stuff, reinstalling stuff but it just won't work in bridged mode so as before I'm reverting to NAT.
Attached: Log file and configuration.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 27329
- Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
- Primary OS: Mac OS X other
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
- Location: Greece
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
Is that a wired interface or a wireless one? I believe it's a wired one, but please confirm.00:00:02.007156 Network <string> = "HostInterfaceNetworking-Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller" (cb=59)
If you can ping your gateway, if you can ping 8.8.8.8, if you can ping google.com, VirtualBox is working as it should. You should look elsewhere for your networking connectivity. Look in your host for firewalls, proxies, antivirus filters, web-cleaning applications, redirectors, etc.BrianG61UK wrote:I can't download anything from inside the VM though ping seems to work fine.
Do NOT send me Personal Messages (PMs) for troubleshooting, they are simply deleted.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: 21. Mar 2014, 02:15
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Windows, DOS, Linux
- Location: Reading. Berkshire. UK.
- Contact:
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
Yes Wired.socratis wrote:Is that a wired interface or a wireless one? I believe it's a wired one, but please confirm.00:00:02.007156 Network <string> = "HostInterfaceNetworking-Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller" (cb=59)
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: 21. Mar 2014, 02:15
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Windows, DOS, Linux
- Location: Reading. Berkshire. UK.
- Contact:
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
Seems unlikely that such things could break Bridged mode while leaving NAT working okay, but I'll have a think.socratis wrote:If you can ping your gateway, if you can ping 8.8.8.8, if you can ping google.com, VirtualBox is working as it should. You should look elsewhere for your networking connectivity. Look in your host for firewalls, proxies, antivirus filters, web-cleaning applications, redirectors, etc.BrianG61UK wrote:I can't download anything from inside the VM though ping seems to work fine.
I might also try going back to VB 5.1.26 just in case. I didn't before because I found it hard to believe it hadn't been working right back to when I installed 5.1.28, but maybe it could have been.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: 21. Mar 2014, 02:15
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Windows, DOS, Linux
- Location: Reading. Berkshire. UK.
- Contact:
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
This appears on only one of your responses. If it's addressed to me then I'm afraid I'm confused by it.socratis wrote:If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 27329
- Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
- Primary OS: Mac OS X other
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
- Location: Greece
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
It's my signature.
Do NOT send me Personal Messages (PMs) for troubleshooting, they are simply deleted.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: 21. Mar 2014, 02:15
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Windows, DOS, Linux
- Location: Reading. Berkshire. UK.
- Contact:
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
I've been replying with the Quote button, have I been doing it wrong?
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 27329
- Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
- Primary OS: Mac OS X other
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
- Location: Greece
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
No, actually you've been using the Quote button wisely. It's mostly for people that want to say a "me too" and they quote the first 3 chapters of "War and Peace" blindly from the previous message, when they don't want to actually quote specific parts of the message. You've been quoting selected questions/issues/passages, which is the proper way of quoting something.
Do NOT send me Personal Messages (PMs) for troubleshooting, they are simply deleted.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 8851
- Joined: 30. Apr 2009, 09:45
- Primary OS: Mac OS X other
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: just about all that run
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
What do you mean?socratis wrote:No, actually you've been using the Quote button wisely. It's mostly for people that want to say a "me too" and they quote the first 3 chapters of "War and Peace" blindly from the previous message, when they don't want to actually quote specific parts of the message. You've been quoting selected questions/issues/passages, which is the proper way of quoting something.
OSX, Linux and Windows Hosts & Guests
There are three groups of people. Those that can count and those that can't.
There are three groups of people. Those that can count and those that can't.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 27329
- Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
- Primary OS: Mac OS X other
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
- Location: Greece
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
Simply perfect Lou! Touché!!!
Do NOT send me Personal Messages (PMs) for troubleshooting, they are simply deleted.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 8851
- Joined: 30. Apr 2009, 09:45
- Primary OS: Mac OS X other
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: just about all that run
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
lol thanks
OSX, Linux and Windows Hosts & Guests
There are three groups of people. Those that can count and those that can't.
There are three groups of people. Those that can count and those that can't.
5.1.30 VirtualBox Extension Pack now noncommercial use!
One thing worth noting is, that with the 5.1.30 release the wording of the PUEL license changed and now restricts the VirtualBox Extension Pack to noncommercial use. Which for some users will be a show-stopper. Up until and including 5.1.28 that restriction was not part of the PUEL license.socratis wrote:... Mainly a regression-fix release for 5.1.28.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 27329
- Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
- Primary OS: Mac OS X other
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
- Location: Greece
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
@DrWhoZee
You have already posted a couple of posts in another thread (using virtual box in company pc). Just because your question was really specific to the 5.1.30 installation (and I'm guessing future ones), I split your question and the subsequent answers and gave it its own thread, PUEL no longer allowing commercial use with VB extension pack 5.1.30. In fact you picked the title yourself in your answer...
Please continue the discussion there, do not duplicate your posts and our answers. Just a link to that specific discussion should be sufficient...
You have already posted a couple of posts in another thread (using virtual box in company pc). Just because your question was really specific to the 5.1.30 installation (and I'm guessing future ones), I split your question and the subsequent answers and gave it its own thread, PUEL no longer allowing commercial use with VB extension pack 5.1.30. In fact you picked the title yourself in your answer...
Please continue the discussion there, do not duplicate your posts and our answers. Just a link to that specific discussion should be sufficient...
Do NOT send me Personal Messages (PMs) for troubleshooting, they are simply deleted.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
Re: Discuss the 5.1.30 release
I updated from 5.1.28 to 5.1.30 and now virtualbox can't see any USB devices. The host is windows 10 and the guests is windows XP Pro.
Any idea what could be wrong? USB is checked and enabled in the settings.
Any idea what could be wrong? USB is checked and enabled in the settings.