The way that I see it you can relabel all the buttons anyway you want and it will never serve a useful purpose for everyone.
The concept was to make a snapshot so if you did an update or added a program and something went south, or you found that you had picked up a virus you could always revert back to a useful state.
Now everyone saw this and decided to use it instead of backing up like they really should and guess what. It does not work that way!
I have seen people that had 6, 8, and even 12 snapshots and wondered what to do with them.
The way it works you should create a write through disk and attach it to the VM and store your data in that so if you revert or merge it is not included and no data is lost.
This is even covered in the users guide (which no one reads).
Edit: One last parting point. I see these as a system restore like Windows uses. Once you restore you have to live with what you get. It may save your bacon but you will loose what ever you have installed. As long as you use the write through disk your data is saved. Without that you are going to loose everything including the data.
Change the wording in snapshots
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 875
- Joined: 10. Oct 2009, 06:27
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Windows Server 2008 R2; Ubuntu 11.04; Windows 2000 Server; Windows XP
Re: Change the wording in snapshots
True, not for Everyone. But it can be improved a whole heap for a lot of people from what it is now.Perryg wrote:The way that I see it you can relabel all the buttons anyway you want and it will never serve a useful purpose for everyone.
Using Writethrough disks is good advice for most people.
Here's my latest go:
Use the steps below to determine the label for the 'Discard Snapshot' action (button and context menu):
(The label will change for each snapshot, according to what that snapshot will do = depends upon which snapshot has been clicked/selected.)
If a snapshot has 1 or more Normal hard disks attached and ALL of those Normal hard disks are also Base disks, then use one of the labels below:
- Discard Snapshot and Copy Current State to Hard Disks
Used only for the last (leaf) snapshot in the list (branch). - Discard Snapshot and Copy Following Snapshot to Hard Disks
Used for all snapshots except for the last (leaf) snapshot in the list (branch).
- Argg!
Use the same label as for the above ALL Normal=Base test, but possibly with a modification/clue/asterisk/warning?
('... Some Hard Disks' ?)
Ignore this possibility and fall through to the next test?
- Discard Snapshot, Keeping Current State
- Discard Snapshot
Comments on correctness of code behaviour and/or label text please.
Last edited by MarkCranness on 26. Oct 2009, 06:57, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: 6. Sep 2008, 23:59
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Ubuntu 10.04 x64, XP SP3, Server 2008 R2, Fedora 13 x86/x64
- Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Re: Change the wording in snapshots
I skimmed over the topic since I made it, but all I really meant was that "discard" didn't not save the changes. Cause guess what? I just ****ing hit discard in an attempt to get rid of a snapshot and ended up merging it with the parent disk.
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 875
- Joined: 10. Oct 2009, 06:27
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Windows Server 2008 R2; Ubuntu 11.04; Windows 2000 Server; Windows XP
Re: Change the wording in snapshots
The new snapshot system (promised in the "next major release") will have operations of:Entegy wrote:Cause guess what? I just ****ing hit discard in an attempt to get rid of a snapshot and ended up merging it with the parent disk.
- Delete snapshot
- Restore snaphot (any in tree)
... so look forward to more of the same, unless Sun take care to make the behaviour of the 'Delete' operation completely clear and unambigious.
I really hope Sun fix it. We can help Sun fix it, if they will let us.