Hello,
Is it possible to pin virtualbox vcpu core to physical ones? For example, pin vcore 1 to physical cpu core 1 in host.
If it's possible, how to do that?
Thanks,
Jian
Pin vcpu core to the physicl cpu core
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 34369
- Joined: 6. Sep 2008, 22:55
- Primary OS: Linux other
- VBox Version: OSE self-compiled
- Guest OSses: *NIX
Re: Pin vcpu core to the physicl cpu core
Not really and you should not do this anyway. The host can better use the resources as well as the guest if it is not restricted. Just don't give more than 50% of the available cores to the guest and you should have optimal usage.
Re: Pin vcpu core to the physicl cpu core
Actually, I run docker containers in virtualbox, and I need to pin one container process to one physical core to guarantee the container's performance. I can pin the container process to the vcpu core. Without the vcpu core pin to the physical core, it seems impossible for my container solution.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 34369
- Joined: 6. Sep 2008, 22:55
- Primary OS: Linux other
- VBox Version: OSE self-compiled
- Guest OSses: *NIX
Re: Pin vcpu core to the physicl cpu core
I don't use docker but if that is they way they want to secure performance I would wonder why. Anyway nothing that VirtualBox can do. You should look at the host OS for any other way, but I would really like to see the rational behind it with modern day processors.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 19. Dec 2007, 08:30
- Primary OS: Ubuntu other
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Windows, Linux, Other
Re: Pin vcpu core to the physicl cpu core
Remote memory (each socket has its own bank of ram) and cache misses (each core has its own cache, though it shares some caches with other cores on the socket). If the OS is moving a VM's threads around then the likelihood of cache misses and slow remote memory lookups increases. Especially in situations where the host is overprovisioned, one might want to have a couple of important VMs pinned to their own cores.Perryg wrote:but I would really like to see the rational behind it with modern day processors.
Guest vcpu -> host cpu affinity is offered in some fashion by FreeBSD's bhyve, Linux's kvm and xen, as well as the big proprietary VM softWare products.
This isn't a feature I use, but it does look like VirtualBox in the minority without it.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 39134
- Joined: 4. Sep 2008, 17:09
- Primary OS: MS Windows 10
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Mostly XP
Re: Pin vcpu core to the physicl cpu core
Always a deeply unimpressive argument that one, I've felt, and I suspect the devs will feel the same way. Show them why lots of moola is sure to come their way when they implement this feature, then they'll be impressed.bobpaul wrote:but it does look like VirtualBox in the minority without it.
-
- Oracle Corporation
- Posts: 2973
- Joined: 19. Dec 2007, 15:45
- Primary OS: MS Windows 7
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Any and all
- Contact:
Re: Pin vcpu core to the physicl cpu core
No. If you need to truly guarantee the container's performance, you need to not run it in a VM.frankkong wrote:I need to pin one container process to one physical core to guarantee the container's performance.