VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Discussions related to using VirtualBox on Linux hosts.
dudekm
Posts: 23
Joined: 1. May 2013, 00:55

VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by dudekm »

Upgrading from 4.3.28-100309 to 5.0.0-101573

After the upgrade VirtualBox on Debian Jessie 8.1 - increased load handling 6x
The processor used on one virtual machine 12-15% - in a virtual machine vCPU-intensive nothing

Before - Normally 2-3%

Also load has increased?
Attachments
Debian_Jessie VirtualBox 5.0.0.png
Debian_Jessie VirtualBox 5.0.0.png (18.23 KiB) Viewed 3552 times
dudekm
Posts: 23
Joined: 1. May 2013, 00:55

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by dudekm »

Reason system load for this: vboxdrv

Here is the error - the system load.
When I stopped vboxdrv load on the system back to normal.
Then I ran and checked, how it behaves in /proc/loadavg

09:02:19 up 55 min, 1 user, load average: 0,00, 0,02, 0,09
Starting VirtualBox kernel modules ...done.
After 1 minute:
09:03:19 up 56 min, 1 user, load average: 0,63, 0,20, 0,14
09:04:19 up 57 min, 1 user, load average: 0,87, 0,35, 0,20
09:05:19 up 58 min, 1 user, load average: 1,00, 0,48, 0,25
09:06:19 up 59 min, 1 user, load average: 1,00, 0,58, 0,30
09:07:19 up 1:00, 1 user, load average: 1,00, 0,65, 0,34
09:10:19 up 1:03, 1 user, load average: 1,00, 0,81, 0,46
09:13:19 up 1:06, 1 user, load average: 1,00, 0,90, 0,55
and
09:31:53 up 1:25, 1 users, load average: 1,87, 1,77, 1,32

What data do You need to diagnose?
Ramshankar
Oracle Corporation
Posts: 793
Joined: 7. Jan 2008, 16:17

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by Ramshankar »

Just to be clear, this happens when you don't run *any* VMs at all right? Just having vboxdrv loaded?

1. Could you paste the dmesg output after you load vboxdrv?

2. If you can upload VBox.log after starting a VM with VirtualBox 5.0, that would be useful.
Oracle Corp.
dudekm
Posts: 23
Joined: 1. May 2013, 00:55

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by dudekm »

Yes of course
The module itself vboxdrv

I will send the LOG file - priv messages
Ramshankar
Oracle Corporation
Posts: 793
Joined: 7. Jan 2008, 16:17

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by Ramshankar »

Please attach VBox.log here to this thread, there is no need for sending it as a private message.

Could you also please post output of:

Code: Select all

ps -elf
after loading vboxdrv.
Oracle Corp.
dudekm
Posts: 23
Joined: 1. May 2013, 00:55

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by dudekm »

Excuse me, I did:

1.--
lsmod |grep vb
vboxpci 23078 0
vboxnetadp 25443 0
vboxnetflt 27648 0
vboxdrv 367029 3 vboxnetadp,vboxnetflt,vboxpci

2.--
csi-02:/# rmmod vboxpci vboxnetadp vboxnetflt vboxdrv

3.--
/etc/init.d/vboxdrv start

[21470.479046] vboxdrv: Found 8 processor cores
[21470.495764] vboxdrv: TSC mode is Invariant, tentative frequency 3499976295 Hz
[21470.495766] vboxdrv: Successfully loaded version 5.0.0 (interface 0x00230001)
[21470.698914] VBoxNetFlt: Successfully started.
[21470.700309] VBoxNetAdp: Successfully started.
[21470.701693] VBoxPciLinuxInit
[21470.702534] vboxpci: IOMMU not found (not registered)

4.--
Start one VM, only Desktop, wait 30 s.

dudekm 22422 29.8 3.2 4944440 1078500 ? SLl 14:07 0:26 /usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox --comment Win7-64bit-Temp --startvm b9cbd6ea-8d8a-443d-9d58-922ef7c9eb09 --no-startvm-errormsgbox
Attachments
VBox.log
(112.06 KiB) Downloaded 19 times
Last edited by dudekm on 10. Jul 2015, 14:35, edited 1 time in total.
Ramshankar
Oracle Corporation
Posts: 793
Joined: 7. Jan 2008, 16:17

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by Ramshankar »

In case it was missed, as I edited the previous post of mine;

Could you also please post output of:

Code: Select all

    ps -elf
after loading vboxdrv.
Oracle Corp.
dudekm
Posts: 23
Joined: 1. May 2013, 00:55

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by dudekm »

Code: Select all

ps -elf
Attachments
ps -elf.log
(13.9 KiB) Downloaded 16 times
Ramshankar
Oracle Corporation
Posts: 793
Joined: 7. Jan 2008, 16:17

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by Ramshankar »

Are you sure vboxdrv was loaded when you took the "ps" output? I was expecting to see 2 VBox kernel thread in the output...
Oracle Corp.
dudekm
Posts: 23
Joined: 1. May 2013, 00:55

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by dudekm »

Ramshankar wrote:In case it was missed, as I edited the previous post of mine;

Could you also please post output of:

Code: Select all

    ps -elf
after loading vboxdrv.
I thought that it was unnecessary
No, I have not seen
dudekm
Posts: 23
Joined: 1. May 2013, 00:55

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by dudekm »

Ramshankar wrote:Are you sure vboxdrv was loaded when you took the "ps" output? I was expecting to see 2 VBox kernel thread in the output...
I thought you check if nothing else overloading the system.
See the previous answer.

I think that the attached data sufficient for diagnosis.
And certainly sufficient for this - to get the bug.
dudekm
Posts: 23
Joined: 1. May 2013, 00:55

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by dudekm »

No guest and host.

"Virtual PC" shows vCPUs 0%
Host maintaining a "Virtual PC" - shows CPU 12-16%

Read carefully.

Please see: Load average
On the Host as you have it a lot.

Ps. Do not Ubuntu and Debian
Perryg
Site Moderator
Posts: 34369
Joined: 6. Sep 2008, 22:55
Primary OS: Linux other
VBox Version: OSE self-compiled
Guest OSses: *NIX

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by Perryg »

Per your request I have removed my posts and will not reply to you again. However I finally figured out what you were seeing and have found the issue. Ram if you like you can PM me for my findings.
dudekm
Posts: 23
Joined: 1. May 2013, 00:55

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by dudekm »

Perryg wrote:Per your request I have removed my posts and will not reply to you again. However I finally figured out what you were seeing and have found the issue. Ram if you like you can PM me for my findings.
Thank You
Ramshankar
Oracle Corporation
Posts: 793
Joined: 7. Jan 2008, 16:17

Re: VirtualBox 5.0.0-101573~Debian~jessie

Post by Ramshankar »

Perryg wrote:Per your request I have removed my posts and will not reply to you again. However I finally figured out what you were seeing and have found the issue. Ram if you like you can PM me for my findings.
Just for the record, this has been taken to the vboxdev mailing list with the subject "Excessive load averages with nothing running". We'll continue tracking this issue there as I'm more likely to get direct feedback there. If it turns out to not be fixed within a patch or two, we should open a proper bug ticket for it.
Oracle Corp.
Post Reply