Windows 10 Hosts
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
5.0.4 is just out today, and the red warning about Windows 10 support has gone. Can anyone confirm:
1. That Windows 10 is now officially supported on 5.0.4
2. It works well in practice on Win 10 RTM (non fast-track)?
1. That Windows 10 is now officially supported on 5.0.4
2. It works well in practice on Win 10 RTM (non fast-track)?
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
just to let you know that the stable 5.04 vbox release, with no more advice of incompatibility with win 10,
has still the issue already reported for bridge network
any ideas..?
has still the issue already reported for bridge network
any ideas..?
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 38786
- Joined: 4. Sep 2008, 17:09
- Primary OS: MS Windows 10
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Mostly XP
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
The user manual provides a list of supported hosts. Windows 10 is still not among them.hakster wrote:5.0.4 is just out today, and the red warning about Windows 10 support has gone. Can anyone confirm:
1. That Windows 10 is now officially supported on 5.0.4
Re: Windows 10 Hosts & VirtualBox-5.0.4-102546-Win
After instaling VirtualBox-5.0.4-102546-Win & Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-5.0.4-102546,
got following error message trying to start the virtual machine:
Für die virtuelle Maschine VGD1 konnte keine neue Sitzung eröffnet werden.
AMD-V is not available (VERR_SVM_NO_SVM).
Fehlercode:E_FAIL (0x80004005)
Komponente:ConsoleWrap
Interface:IConsole {872da645-4a9b-1727-bee2-5585105b9eed}
System is AMD Athlon II X2 250 64-Bit-processor & 16GB memory;
Any help weolcome,
& kind regards
Gerd
got following error message trying to start the virtual machine:
Für die virtuelle Maschine VGD1 konnte keine neue Sitzung eröffnet werden.
AMD-V is not available (VERR_SVM_NO_SVM).
Fehlercode:E_FAIL (0x80004005)
Komponente:ConsoleWrap
Interface:IConsole {872da645-4a9b-1727-bee2-5585105b9eed}
System is AMD Athlon II X2 250 64-Bit-processor & 16GB memory;
Any help weolcome,
& kind regards
Gerd
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
Also having CPU virtualization problems on Windows 10 x64 Enterprise.
VirtualBox 5.0.4 r102546 with matching Extension Pack. CPU is AMD FX-8320 8-Core.
When I add an existing Windows 10 guest, which works perfectly well in Windows 8.1, on the same machine (I have a dual-boot configuration), I receive the following error message:
Based on viewtopic.php?f=1&t=62339 , I thought that perhaps Hyper-V had been installed by default in Windows 10, but I checked the "Programs and Features" area of the Control Panel and Hyper-V is not checked.
Has anyone else run into this specific issue? I would surely appreciate any hints!
Thanks in advance.
UPDATE: I found the solution.
The culprit that had glommed onto CPU virtualization, thereby preventing VirtualBox from same, ended-up being Avast Antivirus. To resolve the issue, I went into Avast, clicked "SETTINGS" (at bottom of left-hand pane), Troubleshooting (in left-hand pane), and unchecked "Enable hardware-assisted virtualization". The change required a reboot, and then VirtualBox was able to boot 64-bit machines.
VirtualBox 5.0.4 r102546 with matching Extension Pack. CPU is AMD FX-8320 8-Core.
When I add an existing Windows 10 guest, which works perfectly well in Windows 8.1, on the same machine (I have a dual-boot configuration), I receive the following error message:
with the options "Close VM", "Copy", and "Continue".VT-x/AMD-V hardware acceleration is not available on your system. Your 64-bit guest will fail to detect a 64-bit CPU and will not be able to boot.
Based on viewtopic.php?f=1&t=62339 , I thought that perhaps Hyper-V had been installed by default in Windows 10, but I checked the "Programs and Features" area of the Control Panel and Hyper-V is not checked.
Has anyone else run into this specific issue? I would surely appreciate any hints!
Thanks in advance.
UPDATE: I found the solution.
The culprit that had glommed onto CPU virtualization, thereby preventing VirtualBox from same, ended-up being Avast Antivirus. To resolve the issue, I went into Avast, clicked "SETTINGS" (at bottom of left-hand pane), Troubleshooting (in left-hand pane), and unchecked "Enable hardware-assisted virtualization". The change required a reboot, and then VirtualBox was able to boot 64-bit machines.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 15. Aug 2012, 23:23
- Primary OS: MS Windows 10
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Linux Mint, Ubuntu Server, Arch, various others
- Location: Renton, WA
- Contact:
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
VirtualBox 5.0.4 r102546 works on Windows 10 build 10532! Thanks guys.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 9. Sep 2015, 08:09
- Primary OS: MS Windows other
- VBox Version: OSE other
- Guest OSses: Ubuntu
- Location: Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
- Contact:
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
I also have a problem with Windows 10 host, bridged networking and rolling back VirtualBox installation process. Can we expect support for windows 10 in future versions of Virtualbox after 5.0.4?
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
I ran the newest VB on a fresh Windows 10, but get the following error:
I got this error since VB 4.1.2+ on both Windows 7/8.1/10.
And I also noticed that, this error will must be happened after run some system clean up apps (such as PCMaster, System Cleaner etc.).
This attachment is the logs file. Please check it.
Code: Select all
E_FAIL (0x80004005)
MachineWrap
IMachine {f30138d4-e5ea-4b3a-8858-a059de4c93fd}
And I also noticed that, this error will must be happened after run some system clean up apps (such as PCMaster, System Cleaner etc.).
This attachment is the logs file. Please check it.
- Attachments
-
VBoxStartup.log
- (16.48 KiB) Downloaded 20 times
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
I saw the red alert about windows 10 compatibility has gone today. Very happy to download and install the latest VB. But after the successful installation, the Internet has gone. The network diagnostics shows this message: "Your broadband modem is experiencing connectivity issues. The connection between your access point, router, or cable modem and the Internet is broken". I removed VB and the Internet started working again without any problem. Anyone else faces similar problem? More weird, only the wired connection is broken. I tried to connect via wifi connection and the Internet works well.
PS. This issue has been there since the first 5.0.x.
PS. This issue has been there since the first 5.0.x.
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 38786
- Joined: 4. Sep 2008, 17:09
- Primary OS: MS Windows 10
- VBox Version: PUEL
- Guest OSses: Mostly XP
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
See my comment near the top of this page.
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
My configuration:
VB 5.0.4
Windows 10 Host
Guest: Both Windows XP and Windows 10 (both using NAT for network adapter)
Seems start up errors has gone ... VB 5.0.2 getting errors and you have to restarting VB Manager few times to get guest up without the error
Issues:
The sound in "windows 10" guest still broken, statics and choppy (I have try different sound card adapter but no luck).
The sound in "windows XP" guest working without any problem.
I switch the network to Bridge for windows XP guest and it works without problem too.
Note: I do not use any 3rd party anti-virus ... just use Windows Defender
UPDATE:
Further testing revealing the sound problem with "Windows 10" guest happen when playing local video clips or clips from Youtube. It does not work with local MP3 files too.
VB 5.0.4
Windows 10 Host
Guest: Both Windows XP and Windows 10 (both using NAT for network adapter)
Seems start up errors has gone ... VB 5.0.2 getting errors and you have to restarting VB Manager few times to get guest up without the error
Issues:
The sound in "windows 10" guest still broken, statics and choppy (I have try different sound card adapter but no luck).
The sound in "windows XP" guest working without any problem.
I switch the network to Bridge for windows XP guest and it works without problem too.
Note: I do not use any 3rd party anti-virus ... just use Windows Defender
UPDATE:
Further testing revealing the sound problem with "Windows 10" guest happen when playing local video clips or clips from Youtube. It does not work with local MP3 files too.
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
Hi all,
I'm running 5.0.4 on Windows 10 RTM.
All my VMs are running with bridged adapter and can communicate between them but not with my host.
I can see ARP being resolved but no higher traffic seems to be blocked.
Behavior repros also with 5.0.5.102588.
Is anybody experiencing the same or has found a fix?
Thank you.
I'm running 5.0.4 on Windows 10 RTM.
All my VMs are running with bridged adapter and can communicate between them but not with my host.
I can see ARP being resolved but no higher traffic seems to be blocked.
Behavior repros also with 5.0.5.102588.
Is anybody experiencing the same or has found a fix?
Thank you.
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
latest r102588 doesn't solve
network bridge
bidirectional drag n drop
network bridge
bidirectional drag n drop
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
Yes, I am experiencing the same issue: the network communication between the Windows 10.0.10240 host and all of my bridged guests are now completely broken. It seem to have started with the latest version of VB 5.0.4 r 102546 - before that (I have used a few experimental VB patches) I could for example download files in Skype and save them directly to my guest; neither does "ping" work anymore, regardless if its from host to guest or vice versa. Nothing I have tried (like starting VB with elevated administrative privileges, and/or executing VB in Windows 7 compatibility mode) have succeeded to solve this particular problem.EPinci wrote:Hi all,
I'm running 5.0.4 on Windows 10 RTM.
All my VMs are running with bridged adapter and can communicate between them but not with my host.
I can see ARP being resolved but no higher traffic seems to be blocked.
Behavior repros also with 5.0.5.102588.
Is anybody experiencing the same or has found a fix?
Thank you.
Re: Windows 10 Hosts
Me too with 5.04 r102546, it is only communication from/to host that is blocked, all other communication to the wider world or between clients is ok.EPinci wrote:I'm running 5.0.4 on Windows 10 RTM.
All my VMs are running with bridged adapter and can communicate between them but not with my host.
I can see ARP being resolved but no higher traffic seems to be blocked.
Behavior repros also with 5.0.5.102588.