Firmware bug in Ubuntu 1710 running on VB 5.2

Discussions about using Linux guests in VirtualBox.
Post Reply
jslegers
Posts: 55
Joined: 26. Jun 2007, 09:24
Primary OS: MS Windows 7
VBox Version: PUEL
Guest OSses: XP, WIN 7, OpenSuse 11.1

Firmware bug in Ubuntu 1710 running on VB 5.2

Post by jslegers »

Hi,

Today I installed VB 5.2. I also wanted to try out Ubuntu 1710. When I turn on the machine shows the following error :

Image

Is this a known issue? Or is this because Ubuntu is too new.
The machine boots normally.

VB is installed on Windows 10 Pro 1703

I have included the log file of the machine.
Attachments
VBox.zip
Logfile of machine
(31.48 KiB) Downloaded 38 times
Perryg
Site Moderator
Posts: 34369
Joined: 6. Sep 2008, 22:55
Primary OS: Linux other
VBox Version: OSE self-compiled
Guest OSses: *NIX

Re: Firmware bug in Ubuntu 1710 running on VB 5.2

Post by Perryg »

Does it work ( the guest )? I see this on 17.10 but it does not make the guest fail, just that it does not see real hardware and letting you know.
socratis
Site Moderator
Posts: 27329
Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
Primary OS: Mac OS X other
VBox Version: PUEL
Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
Location: Greece

Re: Firmware bug in Ubuntu 1710 running on VB 5.2

Post by socratis »

This issue was discussed a couple of months ago (July 2017) in the developers' mailing list. Start from this reply and work your way by clicking "Next message" if you want more information. I'll include the linked message here for the search engines to pick up:
Michal wrote:
Hans wrote:I just upgraded a vbox guest to 4.13, the good news is everything works fine, but one thing which I noticed, which would be nice to fix is this new error message:
[ 0.000000] [Firmware Bug]: TSC_DEADLINE disabled due to Errata; please update microcode to version: 0xb2 (or later)
This is on a Skylake host with no special settings done to the guest (I selected the Fedora 64 bit template when installing).
The message is harmless. It's triggered because VirtualBox currently does not expose the host CPU microcode revision to guest operating systems. I don't think we want to do that without fully understanding what sorts of assumptions operating systems might make when they see the actual revision.

At any rate, VirtualBox currently doesn't support TSC deadline timers so the message is simply noise.
Do NOT send me Personal Messages (PMs) for troubleshooting, they are simply deleted.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
michaln
Oracle Corporation
Posts: 2973
Joined: 19. Dec 2007, 15:45
Primary OS: MS Windows 7
VBox Version: PUEL
Guest OSses: Any and all
Contact:

Re: Firmware bug in Ubuntu 1710 running on VB 5.2

Post by michaln »

This was fixed in the Linux kernel very recently, the message is bogus. It can be safely ignored.
jslegers
Posts: 55
Joined: 26. Jun 2007, 09:24
Primary OS: MS Windows 7
VBox Version: PUEL
Guest OSses: XP, WIN 7, OpenSuse 11.1

Re: Firmware bug in Ubuntu 1710 running on VB 5.2

Post by jslegers »

michaln wrote:This was fixed in the Linux kernel very recently, the message is bogus. It can be safely ignored.
Thank you for the update.
Yeti13
Posts: 5
Joined: 6. Sep 2019, 12:38

Re: Firmware bug in Ubuntu 1710 running on VB 5.2

Post by Yeti13 »

Unfortunately, this bug doesn't seem to be as harmless as supposed.

Some time ago I tried to install Virtualbox 5 and later 6 on an Ubuntu 18.04 LTS HOST on my laptop.
Ubuntu is the default system to boot after restart on a dual boot machine.

This installation gave many problems and didn't succeed (problems with compiling kernel-drivers, or so).

Worse: after restart the Ubuntu HOST didn't start up but gave the message "TSC_deadline disabled due to errata ...".
There was no way to restore the Ubuntu host to a working condition, as there was no command line available for
a repair task ...

Fortunately the (grub ?) bootmanager still allowed the Windows 10 partition to boot as an alternative.
socratis
Site Moderator
Posts: 27329
Joined: 22. Oct 2010, 11:03
Primary OS: Mac OS X other
VBox Version: PUEL
Guest OSses: Win(*>98), Linux*, OSX>10.5
Location: Greece

Re: Firmware bug in Ubuntu 1710 running on VB 5.2

Post by socratis »

Yeti13,
I honestly don't see how your host's general problems and this "TSC_deadline" one, have anything to do with a virtual machine. We've heard from a core developer that the message is a red herring, and we haven't seen yet a problem with a VM stemming out of this "error"...
Do NOT send me Personal Messages (PMs) for troubleshooting, they are simply deleted.
Do NOT reply with the "QUOTE" button, please use the "POST REPLY", at the bottom of the form.
If you obfuscate any information requested, I will obfuscate my response. These are virtual UUIDs, not real ones.
Yeti13
Posts: 5
Joined: 6. Sep 2019, 12:38

Re: Firmware bug in Ubuntu 1710 running on VB 5.2

Post by Yeti13 »

Dear Socratis,

I should have posted this error on the VirtualBox forum for a Linux hosts earlier, as it is more appropriate there. But still:

Several attempts to install VirtualBox 6 on a Ubuntu 18.04 HOST did fail. The last attempt seemed to have succeeded, after a new NEEDED kernel driver for VirtualBox had been compiled in Ubuntu. Restarting Ubuntu was necessary in order to let the new driver be installed.

After that this weird message appears during boot (your team explained the reason earlier on in this forum) but the boot process of the HOST stops.

Searching the web for an explanation, in this situation (early boot) only updating the BIOS/firmware was applicable, but it was already up to date. It is strange that Google did not find this somehow related forum post, which I only found recently by accident.

This is not a real problem, as I now have Ubuntu 18.04 running as a GUEST In Virtualbox 6.010 in Windows 10.

If, for some reason, the complete error-screen of the boot process (I need to make a real photo ...) would be usefull, I can of course send it in.
Post Reply