Differences in paravirtualization providers?

This is for discussing general topics about how to use VirtualBox.
Post Reply
AnKe
Posts: 7
Joined: 29. Sep 2015, 07:10

Differences in paravirtualization providers?

Post by AnKe »

Hi,

can someone please explain the differences between the currently offered paravirtualization providers in VB5?

The official manual covers only the guest OS specific like KVM or Hyper-V and "minimal". But what exactly means "legacy" and what are the detailed differences in relation to not having a paravirt provider at all?

Thx,
Andreas
frank
Oracle Corporation
Posts: 3362
Joined: 7. Jun 2007, 09:11
Primary OS: Debian Sid
VBox Version: PUEL
Guest OSses: Linux, Windows
Location: Dresden, Germany
Contact:

Re: Differences in paravirtualization providers?

Post by frank »

Please do also have a look at the VBoxManage --paravirtprovider parameter:

This setting specifies which paravirtualization interface to provide to the guest operating system. Specifying none explicitly turns off exposing any paravirtualization interface. The option default, will pick an appropriate interface depending on the guest OS type while starting the VM. This is the default option chosen while creating new VMs. The legacy option is chosen for VMs which were created with older VirtualBox versions and will pick a paravirtualization interface while starting the VM with VirtualBox 5.0 and newer. The minimal provider is mandatory for Mac OS X guests, while kvm and hyperv are recommended for Linux and Windows guests respectively.
Post Reply